Back

Advancing Snow Leopard Density Estimates to Assess Population Dynamics Over Time in Afghanistan

Bohnett, E. T.; Poya Faryabi, S.; Lewison, R.; An, L.; Ostrowski, S.

2025-08-28 ecology
10.1101/2025.08.25.672058 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Effective wildlife monitoring requires innovative methodologies to ensure accurate population assessments for conservation planning. This study focuses on snow leopards (Panthera uncia), a species classified as Vulnerable by the IUCN due to habitat loss, climate change, and over-exploitation. Employing spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models and AI-assisted individual identification, we analyzed camera trapping data from 2012-2013 and 2017-2019 to assess changes in snow leopard density and abundance in Wakhan National Park, Afghanistan. Our analysis used single-session and multi-session models to provide a comprehensive view of population dynamics. Single-session models revealed a substantial increase in density, with the full model estimate rising from 1.38 {+/-} 0.39 SE to 3.57 {+/-} 0.88 SE, while right-only and left-only models showed increases from 1.43 {+/-} 0.53 SE to 3.38 {+/-} 1.01 SE and from 1.04 {+/-} 0.36 SE to 2.21 {+/-} 0.72 SE, respectively. Our findings also highlight the importance of incorporating bilateral asymmetry into population estimates to avoid overestimation. For single-session models, the full model density estimate was 11.7% higher in 2012-2013 and 27.8% higher in 2017-2019 compared to the average of the left-only and right-only estimates. For multi-session models, the full model density estimate was 13.0% higher in 2012-2013 and 46.9% higher in 2017-2019. This emphasizes the importance of addressing asymmetry to avoid potential overestimation. This study demonstrates the potential of combining advanced analytical frameworks with AI to improve wildlife population assessments. By refining SCR methodologies and addressing key biases, these methods provide critical insights for snow leopard conservation and broader applications to wildlife monitoring. While the results indicate a significant increase in snow leopard populations, continued monitoring and long-term studies are essential to account for changes due to environmental and anthropogenic factors.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
5
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
12
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
19
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%