mRNA and Protein Subunit COVID-19 Vaccine Reactogenicity and the Relationship to Productivity for Healthcare Workers and First Responders
Yoon, S. K.; Phillips, A. L.; Calhoun, S.; Odom, D.; Ziemiecki, R.; Jackson, L.; Mckell, J.; Griffin, J.; Choi, J. M.; Prillaman, B. A.; Campbell, R.; Hahn, B.; Warren, B.; Fix, J.; Rousculp, M. D.; Ellsworth, G. L.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo compare the percentage of participants that experienced any solicited systemic reactogenicity symptom after one dose of the updated 2024-2025 adjuvanted protein-based Novavax (NVX; JN.1) or Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA (PFZ; KP.2) COVID-19 vaccine within 2- and 7-days post-vaccination and examine its disrupting impact on daily life. MethodsIn this prospective, interventional, real-world study (SHIELD/NCT06633835), previously vaccinated healthcare workers (HCWs) and first responders (FRs) from Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, and surrounding areas self-selected to receive NVX or PFZ. At 2- and 7-days post-vaccination, participants self-reported on 11 vaccine-related reactogenicity symptoms and functional impairment using a 5-item modified Sheehan Disability Scale. Results588 participants completed the Day 2 questionnaire (NVX, n=219; PFZ, n=369); 583 completed the Day 7 questionnaire (NVX, n=217; PFZ, n=366). Two-days post-vaccination, NVX recipients were less likely to report a systemic (OR=0.40; 95% CI, 0.21-0.75) or local (OR=0.10; 95% CI, 0.30-0.33) reactogenicity symptom and lost 50% fewer work hours (0.7 vs 1.4 h) and 66% fewer productive hours (0.8 vs 2.4 h) than PFZ recipients. There was little to no difference between vaccines at 7-days post-vaccination. ConclusionFewer reactogenicity symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination suggest use of the NVX vaccine as an immunization option with a lower disruption to daily life.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Recombinant Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: A Randomised, Comparator-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial 96%
- Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in an urgent care setting 96%
- 2024-2025 BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in non-immunocompromised adults: mid-season estimates from vaccine registries in two states linked to administrative claims 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety Monitoring of mRNA Vaccines Administered During the Initial 6 Months of the U.S. COVID-19 Vaccination Program: Reports to Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and v-safe 98%
- Safety and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine with AS03 adjuvant in healthy adults: interim findings from a phase 2, randomised, dose-finding, multi-centre study 97%
- Immunogenicity and safety of a third dose, and immune persistence of CoronaVac vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: interim results from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiology of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA vaccines in Ontario, Canada: by vaccine product, schedule and interval 95%
- Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Children below 5 Years (CoVacU5) – an Investigator-Initiated Retrospective Cohort Study 95%
- Guillain-Barré Syndrome after COVID-19 Vaccination in the Vaccine Safety Datalink 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse effects and antibody titers in response to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a prospective study of healthcare workers 97%
- Effectiveness of the 2023-2024 Omicron XBB.1.5-containing mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273.815) in preventing COVID-19-related hospitalizations and medical encounters among adults in the United States: An interim analysis 95%
- Immunogenicity of JN.1- and KP.2-Encoding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Against 1 JN.1 Subvariants in Adult Participants 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.