Developing a Comprehensive Framework for Real-World Data Case Validation in Vaccine Safety Monitoring: The VAC4EU experience
Dehghan Tarazjani, A.; Weibel, D.; Aurelius, T.; Zwiers, L.; van den Berg, J.; Perez-Breva, L.; Gimeno-Miguel, A.; Stona, l.; Solorzano, M.; Assefa Desalegn, A.; Poblador-Plou, B.; Lysen, T.; Wheler, J.; Zidan, M.; Carreras, J. J.; Villalobos, F.; Ehrenstein, V.; Morton, K.; Rebordosa, C.; Ahmadizar, F.; Fortuny, J.; Arana, A.; Sturkenboom, M. C.
Show abstract
PurposeReal-world evidence (RWE) is essential for post-licensure monitoring of vaccine safety, as pre-licensure trials are often limited in sample size, population diversity, and duration of follow-up. The Vaccine Monitoring Collaboration for Europe (VAC4EU) has developed a structured validation pipeline that operationalizes Brighton Collaboration (BC) case definitions for real-world data (RWD) in a harmonized, scalable and reusable manner. MethodsVAC4EU developed a systematic, stepwise approach to validate vaccine safety outcomes utilizing BC case definitions where available. The approach involves: 1) Critical review of BC definition and adaptation to RWD by clinical and RWD experts; 2) Creation of dummy cases based on published reports; 3) Creation of REDCap electronic data collection forms (eDCF) incorporating decision logic to assigned levels of certainty (LOC); 4) Iterative testing of decision logic; and 5) comprehensive training of abstractors with real-time feedback. A dedicated task force assigned reference LOCs for dummy cases. Inter-rater reliability was measured using Fleiss kappa ({kappa}) by comparing abstractor LOCs to the reference standard. ResultsThe validation pipeline was applied to 16 COVID-19 vaccine safety outcomes, 13 of them had existing BC definitions. Eleven eDCFs required adaptation to accommodate missing or unstructured information common in RWD. In total, 78 dummy cases were developed across the 16 outcomes, and 15 REDCap eDCFs were created. Myocarditis and pericarditis shared a single form. Across 33 trained abstractors, 747 individual case abstractions were completed. Agreement analysis showed 93 discrepancies (12.4%) and moderate overall concordance ({kappa} = 0.55), with the lowest for Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome ({kappa} = -0.05). ConclusionThe VAC4EU validation pipeline provides a standardized framework for training and validating vaccine safety outcome validation using RWD. By adapting BC case definitions and emphasizing targeted abstractor training with ongoing feedback, this approach improves the reliability of post-marketing surveillance studies.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- INSIGHT: A Tool for Fit-for-Purpose Evaluation and Quality Assessment of Observational Data Sources for Real World Evidence on Medicine and Vaccine Safety 93%
- Safety Monitoring of Bivalent COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Among Recipients 6 months and Older in the United States 92%
- A Systematic Process for Assessing Fitness-for-Purpose of Health Outcomes for Computable Phenotyping with Electronic Health Record Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety of RSV Vaccine among Pregnant Individuals: A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Study Using Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System 92%
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 92%
- Development and validation of multivariable prediction models for adverse COVID-19 outcomes in IBD patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Characterizing the incidence of adverse events of special interest for COVID-19 vaccines across eight countries: a multinational network cohort study 95%
- Myocarditis and Pericarditis following COVID-19 Vaccination: Rapid Systematic Review of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Course 93%
- Clinical Severity and mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness for Omicron, Delta, and Alpha SARS-CoV-2 Variants in the United States: A Prospective Observational Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strengthening Policy Coding Methodologies to Improve COVID-19 Disease Modeling and Policy Responses: A Proposed Coding Framework and Recommendations 92%
- Outbreaks of publications about emerging infectious diseases: the case of SARS-CoV-2 and Zika virus 91%
- Power and sample size considerations for test-negative design with bias correction: a case study on the world first malaria vaccine 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.