Back

Interoceptive Ability is Unrelated to Mental Health Symptoms: Evidence From a Large Scale Multi-Domain Psychophysical Investigation

Banellis, L.; Nikolova, N.; Fischer Ehmsen, J.; Courtin, A. S.; Vejlo, M.; Tyrer, A.; Bohme, R.; Bavato, F.; Hoogervorst, K.; Fardo, F.; Allen, M. G.

2025-08-27 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.08.25.25334366 medRxiv
Show abstract

Interoception--the sensing and perception of the internal viscera--is widely cast as a transdiagnostic mechanism linking brain-body interaction to mental illness. Prevailing models propose that altered interoceptive ability reflects a core liability underlying diverse psychiatric symptoms. We tested this hypothesis in a large community sample (N = 547) using psychophysically optimised tasks spanning cardiac and respiratory domains, combined with hierarchical Bayesian modelling and comprehensive symptom profiling. Contrary to this central prediction, objective interoceptive sensitivity, precision, and metacognitive insight were largely unrelated to general symptom burden or specific mental health dimensions. In contrast, self-reported interoceptive sensibility showed moderate associations with symptoms, but semantic similarity analyses suggest these reflect conceptual rather than mechanistic overlap. These findings challenge the prevailing view that objective interoceptive sensitivity is a broad marker of psychopathology, prompting a reconsideration of how we measure interoception in mental health research.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.