Using EEG to measure the neural effects of oxytocin administration: A meta-analysis and systematic review
Deilhaug, E.; Moerkerke, M.; Sartorius, A. I.; Kang, H.; Kildal, E. S.; Kjersti, W. M.; Elvsashagen, T.; Westlye, L. T.; Naerland, T.; Andreassen, O. A.; Quintana, D. S.
Show abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) has emerged as a key method for investigating the neural mechanisms through which oxytocin influences cognition and behaviour. EEG is cost-effective, has excellent temporal precision, and may elucidate neural correlates of emotional and cognitive processes. EEG studies evaluating oxytocins electrophysiological effects have, however, yielded mixed results, which is likely driven by heterogeneity in EEG measures, study designs, dosages, and samples. To investigate the effect of oxytocin administration on EEG measures, we performed two multilevel random effects meta-analyses: The first meta-analysis synthesized studies investigating the effects of oxytocin administration on different neural correlates of social and cognitive processing; the second meta-analysis synthesized studies evaluating effects of oxytocin administration on exploratory, less task-specific neural activity measures, such as the modulation of microstates. Across both meta-analyses, we synthesized 161 effect sizes from 28 randomised controlled trials with a total of 1361 participants from different population groups. These multilevel meta-analyses yielded small effect sizes of oxytocin administration across different EEG measures reflecting social and cognitive processes (Hedges g = 0.14), and exploratory neural activity (Hedges g = 0.28) with significant heterogeneity estimates (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Moderator analyses revealed that the different EEG measurements of interest (e.g., event-related potentials) and the proportion of female participants were found to significantly moderate the effect of oxytocin on neural EEG activity. Altogether, these meta-analyses present tentative evidence for oxytocin administration modulating a wide range of neural activity. We observed substantial heterogeneity across studies - in terms of study designs, experimental paradigms and EEG measurements, and participant characteristics. More research is warranted to map out the context-specific effects of oxytocin administration on different neural markers, to better understand the neurobiological mechanisms of oxytocin.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping social reward and punishment processing in the human brain: A voxel-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging findings using the Social Incentive Delay task 95%
- The central autonomic system revisited - convergent evidence for a regulatory role of the insular and midcingulate cortex from neuroimaging meta-analyses 94%
- From Feasibility to Utility: A Meta-Analysis of Amygdala-Neurofeedback 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain Functional Connectivity and Anatomical Features as Predictors of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Outcome for Anxiety in Youths 91%
- Neurophysiological Changes Associated with Vibroacoustically-augmented Breath-focused Mindfulness for Dissociation: Targeting Interoception and Attention 91%
- Robotically-induced auditory-verbal hallucinations: combining self-monitoring and strong perceptual priors 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mother Brain is Wired for Social Moments 93%
- Oxytocin administration enhances pleasantness and neural responses to gentle stroking but not moderate pressure social touch by increasing peripheral concentrations 93%
- Neonatal sensitivity to vocal emotions: A developmental change at 37 weeks of gestational age 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Oxytocin increases the pleasantness of affective touch and orbitofrontal cortex activity independent of valence 93%
- Coping under stress: Prefrontal control predicts stress burden during the COVID-19 crisis 92%
- Oxytocin enhances the recovery of eye-contact induced autonomic arousal: A treatment mechanism study with placebo-controlled design 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.