Back

Epidemiology Of Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia: Prevalence And Associated Clinical Factors In Latin America

Chaparro-Solano, H. M.; Teixeira-dos-Santos, D.; Waldo, E.; Leal, T. P.; Inca-Martinez, M.; Alcauter, S.; Medina-Rivera, A.; Ruiz-Contreras, A. E.; Cornejo-Olivas, M.; Mejia-Rojas, K.; Armas, C.; Chana-Cuevas, P.; Rojas, N.; Orozco, J. L.; Munoz Ospina, B.; Aguillon, D.; Buritica, O.; Moreno, S.; Tumas, V.; Schuh, A. F. S.; Rieder, C. R.; Santos-Lobato, B. L.; Duarte, J. S.; Pena, S. L.; Rodriguez-Violante, M.; Hernandez-Medrano, A. J.; Gatto, E. M.; DaPrat, G. A.; Arboleda, G.; Kauffman, M. A.; Rodriguez-Quiroga, S. A.; Vinuela, A.; Espinal Martinez, A. O.; Braga-Neto, P.; Camargos, S.; Ferna

2025-08-27 neurology
10.1101/2025.08.25.25334104 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAlthough levodopa remains the gold standard treatment for Parkinsons disease (PD), its chronic use is associated with levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID), a motor complication that impacts prognosis, quality of life, and treatment costs. Most known LID-associated factors have been identified in European-descendant populations. ObjectivesTo describe the epidemiology of LID in Latin American and Caribbean (LATAM) countries and assess the relevance of known and novel LID-associated factors in this population. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the Latin American Research consortium on the Genetics of Parkinsons Disease (LARGE-PD). We included PD patients with information on LID status and levodopa use from eight LATAM countries. LID prevalence was calculated overall and by country. Countries were compared on demographic and clinical variables. Logistic regression was used to identify associations with LID. ResultsA total of 3,695 PD patients (58.8% male) were included. Overall LID prevalence was 25.4% [95% CI: 24.06-26.87], ranging from 9.3% in Colombia to 45.1% in Puerto Rico. Prevalence increased progressively with longer disease duration. Country comparisons showed that not all known LID-associated factors explained prevalence differences. In logistic regression, fast disease progression was significantly associated with LID (OR: 1.55, 95%CI: 1.16-2.07), while sex was not (OR: 1.02, 95%CI: 0.87-1.18). ConclusionsThis is the largest study on LID epidemiology in LATAM. While some known risk factors remain relevant, others, like sex, do not, underscoring the need for population-specific studies. Future work should integrate environmental, clinical, and genetic data to better understand LID mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.