Back

Effects of Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation on Emotion Processing in Parkinson's Disease

Bingoel, D.; Klimaschewski, C.; Timmermann, L.; Waldthaler, J.; Pedrosa, D. J.

2025-08-28 neurology
10.1101/2025.08.25.25333958 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundProcessing of emotion plays a critical role in social interaction. People with Parkinsons Disease (PwPD) may experience impaired facial emotion recognition for negative emotions. Previous evidence regarding the effects of deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is inconclusive. ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of STN-DBS on emotion processing in PwPD controlling for effects of disease progression and DBS-induced changes in cognitive ability. The secondary aim was to explore the effect of post-DBS adjustments of dopamine replacement therapy. Methods32 cognitively intact PwPD (16 DBS, 16 non-DBS) and 22 healthy controls performed tasks assessing recognition and discrimination of emotions and an emotional Go/No-Go paradigm, complemented by task versions using non-emotional stimuli. Baseline assessments were conducted two months before DBS surgery and followed up three months postoperatively. Mixed-effects models analysed group-by-time interactions on task performance measured as accuracy and reaction time. Associations of longitudinal changes in non-motor symptoms and medication dosages with task performance were assessed using bootstrapped Pearsons correlations. ResultsA significant DBS-associated increase in reaction times was found specifically in the emotional conditions, while there was no evidence for a DBS-effect on the accuracy of emotion recognition or discrimination. Post-DBS dose reduction of dopamine agonists was associated with improvement in emotion recognition. ConclusionSTN-DBS does not lead to a generalized decline in emotional processing when controlling for important confounders. Instead, changes in response speed suggest altered processing dynamics. Adjustments in pharmacological treatment regimens contribute to altered FER after DBS surgery.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.