Back

Beak elongation as key innovation in shorebird adaptive radiation

Baguette, M.; Le Floch, G.; Lacassagne, E.; Bels, V.; Schtickzelle, N.

2025-08-28 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.08.24.671984 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adaptive radiations are often associated with phenotypic innovations that broaden ecological opportunity and bias subsequent ecological divergence. In shorebirds (Charadriiformes), variation in beak length has long been linked to resource partitioning, yet its role as a functional innovation has remained largely untested. Here, we integrate behavioural, morphological, and phylogenetic data from 29 Western Palearctic shorebird species to evaluate whether beak elongation fulfils key expectations of a candidate innovation by being repeatedly associated with ecological and functional transitions. Species with longer than expected beaks relative to body size consistently exhibit distinct locomotor, prey-capture, and food-transport strategies. These integrated morphological-behavioural syndromes recur across independent lineages, suggesting convergent evolution driven by shared ecological constraints. Phylogenetic analyses indicate multiple independent origins of relative beak elongation, supporting its role as a repeated evolutionary solution. Together, our results support a functionally integrated view of adaptation, in which coordinated changes in morphology, sensory investment, and behaviour facilitate access to alternative foraging microhabitats and enable repeated ecological transitions within shorebirds. More broadly, this study provides a testable framework for identifying candidate innovations based on replicated trait-niche associations. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=198 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/671984v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (54K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@185f912org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a33baforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a37b35org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ee0831_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.