Spine-Related Conditions in MEPS 2020:Association Between Care Fragmentation and Outpatient MRI/CT Use and Radiology Expenditures
Bouras, A.
Show abstract
Outpatient advanced imaging is central to the evaluation of spine-related conditions, yet concerns persist about coordination and potential overuse. We assessed whether higher care fragmentation is associated with increased MRI/CT use and radiology expenditures among U.S. adults with spine-related conditions using 2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data. A spine cohort was identified from ICD-10-CM and CCSR codes; care fragmentation was categorized using fixed cutpoints on full-year utilization. Outcomes included MRI/CT-only imaging in office-based care and radiology expenditures analyzed with survey-weighted regression models. Compared with Low fragmentation, Medium and High fragmentation were associated with higher odds of advanced imaging and higher odds of any radiology spending; conditional spending was directionally higher for High vs Low but imprecise. Effects appeared strongest among privately insured. Findings suggest opportunities to improve coordination and value in ambulatory spine care.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting pain and function outcomes in people consulting with shoulder pain: The PANDA-S clinical cohort and qualitative study protocol (ISRCTN 46948079) 89%
- Trends in patient attachment to an aging primary care workforce: a population-based serial cross-sectional study in Ontario, Canada 89%
- Inequalities in healthcare disruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from 12 UK population-based longitudinal studies 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer Screening and Treatment in Older Adults: The Multiethnic Cohort Study 89%
- Unequal Recovery in Colorectal Cancer Screening Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Microsimulation Analysis 86%
- Understanding disruptions in cancer care to reduce increased cancer burden 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.