Performance of a multi-target, multi-cancer early detection (MCED) blood test in a prospectively collected cohort
Gainullin, V.; Manesse, M.; Zhuang, F.; Gray, M.; Hwang, H.; Cerqueira, G. C.; Nobles, C. L.; Kumar, M.; Arvai, K.; Chen, X.; Tyson, C. C.; Ji, C.; Bae, J.; Guthrie, V. B.; Kaur, J.; Katerov, V. E.; Hogstrom, L.; Hagmann, L.; Uren, P. J.; Garces, J.; Allawi, H. T.; Fa, V.; McElhinny, A.; Silvestri, G. A.; Chesla, D.; Given, R. W.; Beer, T. M.; Diehl, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundMulti-target blood tests have the potential to detect a broad range of cancer types and stages. We previously trained and independently assessed the performance of four biomarker classes for cancer detection in a retrospectively assembled case-control feasibility study. The primary aim of this study was to assess the performance of a methylation and protein (MP) classifier using samples from a large, multi-center, prospectively collected case-control study. As part of the ongoing assay development process, we also performed an exploratory analysis investigating the addition of a somatic mutation reflex approach (MP-reflex) on samples with scores below the threshold for a positive MP call but above a clear negative MP call. MethodsThis study included 6,352 samples (1,438 cancer and 4,914 non-cancer) representing all stages among 21 tumor organ types divided approximately equally between a training and a test set. The sensitivity of the MP classifier was determined at a high specificity. The MP-reflex approach was investigated on MP samples at the same specificity threshold and detectable MP signals above pre-specified lower thresholds. ResultsAt 98.5% specificity, the observed overall sensitivity for MP biomarkers was 50.9%, with sensitivities of 15.4%, 26.1%, 38.0%, 67.8%, 85.5%, and 37.5% for stages I, I and II combined, II, III, IV, and unknown, respectively. When breast and prostate cancers were excluded from the analysis, overall test sensitivity was 56.8%, with sensitivities of 17.2%, 30.7%, 48.6%, 73.5%, 86.5%, and 40.0% for stages I, I and II combined, II, III, IV, and unknown, respectively. ConclusionMethylation and protein biomarkers detected all cancer organ types incorporated in the analysis, including those without standard of care (SoC) cancer screening options and aggressive cancers with poor 5-year survival. These results demonstrate the potential clinical validity of multi-biomarker testing for the detection of several cancer types.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Combination of hotspot mutations with methylation and fragmentomic profiles to enhance Multi-Cancer Early Detection 95%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 92%
- Restriction site associated DNA sequencing for tumour mutation burden estimation and mutation signature analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Quantitative Framework to Study Potential Benefits and Harms of Multi-cancer Early Detection Testing 92%
- The Gastric Cancer Registry: A Genomic Translational Resource for Multidisciplinary Research in Stomach Malignancies 91%
- A new colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating family history, personal and environmental factors 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical validation of Whole Genome Sequencing for routine cancer diagnostics 94%
- Validation of a Pan-Cancer NGS Liquid Biopsy Test for Routine Hospital Use: An International Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation 93%
- Bridge Capture Permits Cost-Efficient, Rapid and Sensitive Molecular Precision Diagnostics 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical performance and concordance with next-generation sequencing of a rapid multiplexed dPCR panel for the detection of actionable DNA and RNA biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer 94%
- Analytical performance of a highly sensitive system to detect gene variants using next-generation sequencing for lung cancer companion diagnostics 91%
- Deep learning models for poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images using transfer learning 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular counting enables accurate and precise quantification of methylated ctDNA for tumor-naive cancer therapy response monitoring 93%
- Detection of genomic alterations in breast cancer with circulating tumour DNA sequencing 93%
- Prevalence of pathogenic variants in DNA damage response genes in patients undergoing cancer risk assessment and reporting a personal history of early-onset renal cancer 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.