Back

Coherent Cross-modal Generation of Synthetic Biomedical Data to Advance Multimodal Precision Medicine

Marchesi, R.; Lazzaro, N.; Endrizzi, W.; Leonardi, G.; Pozzi, M.; Ragni, F.; Bovo, S.; Moroni, M.; Osmani, V.; Jurman, G.

2025-09-01 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.08.22.671728 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Integration of multimodal, multi-omics data is critical for advancing precision medicine, yet its application is frequently limited by incomplete datasets where one or more modalities are missing. To address this challenge, we developed a generative framework capable of synthesizing any missing modality from an arbitrary subset of available modalities. We introduce Coherent Denoising, a novel ensemble-based generative diffusion method that aggregates predictions from multiple specialized, single-condition models and enforces consensus during the sampling process. We compare this approach against a multicondition, generative model that uses a flexible masking strategy to handle arbitrary subsets of inputs. The results show that our architectures successfully generate high-fidelity data that preserve the complex biological signals required for downstream tasks. We demonstrate that the generated synthetic data can be used to maintain the performance of predictive models on incomplete patient profiles and can leverage counterfactual analysis to guide the prioritization of diagnostic tests. We validated the frameworks efficacy on a large-scale multimodal, multi-omics cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) of over 10,000 samples spanning across 20 tumor types, using data modalities such as copy-number alterations (CNA), transcriptomics (RNA-Seq), proteomics (RPPA), and histopathology (WSI). This work establishes a robust and flexible generative framework to address sparsity in multimodal datasets, providing a key step toward improving precision oncology.

Published in PLOS Computational Biology (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.