Back

Hormonal and Environmental Drivers of Spermiation in the Endangered Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog (Rana muscosa): Toward Biologically Informed Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Calatayud, N. E.; Jacobs, L.; Upton, R.; Chancellor, S.; Durrant, B.; Shier, D. M.

2026-07-31 zoology
10.1101/2025.08.21.671667 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Amphibians are among the most threatened vertebrates, yet assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) remain underutilised in their conservation. We developed and evaluated a biologically relevant, non-lethal sperm collection protocol for Rana muscosa, a critically endangered frog in a long-term conservation breeding program. Thirteen hormone treatments were tested across six post-injection time points, and sperm quality was assessed via concentration, motility, osmolality, and pH. Generalised linear mixed models revealed that gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRHa) alone significantly outperformed hCG-based regimens. The 3 {micro}g/g GnRHa dose yielded the highest sperm concentration and sustained motility from 3 to 24 hours post-injection. Motility was highest under moderately acidic (pH 6.5-7.0) and hypoosmotic (75-100 mOsm/kg) conditions. To support decision-making, we applied a refined Wildlife Sperm Index (WSI) that weights motility and concentration as primary functional-yield traits, with motility given greater relative weight given its direct role in fertilisation, and treats pH and osmolality as secondary environmental-compatibility traits. Under this revised composite score, 3 {micro}g/g GnRHa achieved the highest overall WSI score, outperforming 2 {micro}g/g and 4 {micro}g/g GnRHa, which ranked second and third, respectively, despite their more favourable pH and osmolality profiles. These findings provide the first evidence-based ART protocol for R. muscosa and offer a transferable framework for optimising gamete collection, IVF, and cryopreservation in line with other amphibian species, advancing both genetic management and species recovery goals.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.