Predicting compatibility between ferredoxins and the Fe protein of nitrogenase using in silico protein modeling
Biswas, A.; Trachtova, K.; Fixen, K. R.
Show abstract
Biological nitrogen fixation is the process by which certain bacteria and archaea use the enzyme nitrogenase to reduce atmospheric nitrogen into bioavailable ammonium. Engineering non-nitrogen-fixing organisms, like plants, to use nitrogenase could reduce dependency on synthetic fertilizer and mitigate the environmental impacts of industrial fertilizer production. However, nitrogenase activity requires delivery of reducing power by small electron carrying proteins known as ferredoxins and flavodoxins, and successfully engineering nitrogenase into new systems will require a mechanistic understanding of electron delivery by these proteins. Most organisms often have multiple ferredoxins, raising the question of which ferredoxin can support nitrogenase activity. The purpose of this study is to gain insight into how we can predict which ferredoxin is compatible with the Fe protein, the component of nitrogenase that interacts with ferredoxin or flavodoxin. Our in silico protein-protein docking simulations reveal that ferredoxins and flavodoxins involved in nitrogen fixation have a distance [≤] 10 [A] between their redox cofactor and the [4Fe-4S] cluster of the Fe protein. We found shorter cofactor distance contributes to faster intermolecular electron tunneling rates (> 106 sec-1). These nitrogen-fixing bacterial ferredoxins also form more complementary interactions with the Fe protein compared to non-nitrogen-fixing bacterial and plant ferredoxins. Heterologous expression of a set of ferredoxins from both nitrogen-fixing and non-nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the diazotroph Rhodopseudomonas palustris support our model-derived prediction that cofactor distances of [≤] 10 [A] favor nitrogenase compatibility. These findings offer a framework to predict and potentially enhance ferredoxin-nitrogenase compatibility, which will help to improve our ability to engineer nitrogen fixation into non-nitrogen-fixing organisms like plants.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential effects of the D1/S264V mutation in Photosystem II with either PsbA1 or PsbA3 on QB, non-heme Iron, and the associated hydrogen-bond network 93%
- Exchange of a single amino acid residue in the cryptophyte phycobiliprotein lyase GtCPES expands its substrate specificity 92%
- Electron flow through NDH-1 complexes is the major driver of cyclic electron flow-dependent proton pumping in cyanobacteria 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of insect and human cytochrome b561 proteins: Insights into candidate ferric reductases in insects 92%
- Larger active site in an ancestral hydroxynitrile lyase increases catalytically promiscuous esterase activity 92%
- Characterization of BLUF-photoreceptors present in Acinetobacter nosocomialis. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Computation of condition-dependent proteome allocation reveals variability in the macro and micro nutrient requirements for growth 91%
- Short-wavelength-sensitive 2 (Sws2) visual photopigment models combined with atomistic molecular simulations to predict spectral peaks of absorbance 91%
- Dynamic coupling of residues within proteins as a mechanistic foundation of many enigmatic pathogenic missense variants 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Bacterial hemophilin homologs and their specific type eleven secretor proteins have conserved roles in heme capture and are diversifying as a family 93%
- Eight Unexpected Selenoprotein Families in ABC transport, in Organometallic Biochemistry in Clostridium difficile and other anaerobes, and in Methylmercury Biosynthesis. 92%
- Structural characterization of pyruvic oxime dioxygenase, a key enzyme of heterotrophic nitrification 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.