Back

Semantic elaboration determines the time course of alpha-beta oscillations during the encoding and retrieval of narrative memories

Biau, E.; Branzi, F. M.

2025-08-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.21.671460 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding and remembering everyday events requires us to retrieve semantic relationships between elements by activating prior knowledge, allowing us to form a deeper memory trace. However, the neural interplay between semantic and episodic systems to encode and retrieve recent memories remains unclear. The present study addresses how semantic elaboration enhances episodic memory formation through neural oscillations. We presented participants with continuous auditory verbal and non-verbal narratives to memorise. Participants rated the perceived coherence of each narrative to provide a subjective measure of semantic elaboration. We assessed participants memory of the narratives depending on semantic elaboration and modality of encoding with a subsequent retrieval test. We recorded their electroencephalogram (EEG) to establish how semantic elaboration modulated the representation of narratives information proxied by neocortical alpha-beta oscillations during the encoding and retrieval. First, we found that semantic elaboration facilitated narrative information processing by speeding perceived coherence responses during encoding. Second, the magnitude of alpha-beta desynchronisation across the semantic network progressively increased with the chronological position of the events indexing information accumulation as the narratives unfolded. Third, the coherence scores of the narratives negatively correlated with the magnitude of alpha-beta oscillation desynchronisation later during successful retrieval. Our findings provide direct behavioural and alpha-beta oscillatory evidence of how semantic elaboration influences the time course of neural operations supporting information representation and reinstatement mediated by neocortical alpha-beta oscillations.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.