Back

The genetic architecture of the human bZIP family

Bendel, A. M.; Eichenbergers, B.; Kempf, G.; Klein, D.; Shimada, K.; Franco, M.; Jaaks-Kraatz, S.; Durdu, S.; Herrmann, V.; Roth, G.; Soneson, C.; Smallwood, S.; Thomae, N. H.; Schubeler, D.; Stadler, M. B.; Zenke, F.; Diss, G.

2025-08-22 biophysics
10.1101/2025.08.21.671354 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Generative biology holds the promise to transform our ability to design and understand living systems by creating novel proteins, pathways, and organisms with tailored functions that address challenges in medicine, sustainability, and technology. However, training generative models requires large quantities of data that captures the genetic architecture of protein function in all its complexity, but these are currently scarce. Here, we systematically mutagenized all 54 human basic-leucine zipper (bZIP) domains and quantified their interactions with each other using bindingPCA, a quantitative deep mutational scanning assay. This resulted in [~]2 million interaction measurements, capturing the effect of all single amino acid substitutions at each of the 35 interfacial positions. We found that mutation effects are largely additive in the vicinity of each wild-type bZIPs, but diverge across the family, indicating strong context dependency. A global additive thermodynamic model provided moderate prediction of mutation effects, while individual models per bZIP achieved higher performance, supporting a model of local simplicity and global complexity. Our results therefore suggest that the genetic architecture of protein function is more complex than previously anticipated, which could hinder predictability. However, a convolutional neural network trained on this dataset could accurately predict binding scores from sequence alone. Furthermore, the model enabled the design of synthetic bZIPs with high target specificity, demonstrating practical applicability for bioengineering purposes. Our study shows that capturing family-wide diversity is essential to reveal context dependencies and train accurate quantitative models of protein-protein interactions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.