Exploring the implementation and integration of structured medication reviews in primary care: A qualitative evaluation using normalization process theory
Reidy, C.; Seeley, A.; Tucker, K.; Bateman, P. A.; Clark, C. E.; Clegg, A.; Ford, G. A.; Gadhia, S.; Hinton, W.; Hobbs, F. D. R.; Jawad, S.; Khunti, K.; Lip, G. Y. H.; de Lusignan, S.; Mant, J.; McCahon, D.; Meza-Torres, B.; Payne, R. A.; Perera-Salazar, R.; Seidu, S.; Sheppard, J. P.; Williams, M.; Wright Drakesmith, C.; McManus, R. J.; Barnes, R. K.
Show abstract
BackgroundStructured Medication Reviews (SMRs) were introduced into primary care in England for patients living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs), polypharmacy, increased frailty, in care homes or at risk of medicines-related harm. SMRs aim to optimise the therapeutic potential of medication and reduce medicine-related harms through holistic reviews. AimTo explore the day-to-day work being undertaken with, and by, clinical pharmacists to implement, embed and integrate SMRs into practice, and consider how to optimise SMRs. Design and settingQualitative one-to-one interviews with clinical pharmacists undertaking SMRs and SMR service leaders/managers (SMR leads) in England between February 2023 and November 2024. MethodParticipants were recruited as part of a wider evaluation of the roll-out of SMRs in England. Interview topic guides and qualitative data analysis were informed by Normalization Process Theory (NPT). ResultsEighteen clinical pharmacists and five SMR leads participated. Participants reported often having to explain the purpose of SMRs and clinical pharmacists roles to patients, partly due to patients not being informed about SMRs. Participants valued SMRs and expressed that trust-building and tailored consultations were important for optimising medications. Integration varied due to high workload, inconsistent leadership support, inadequate administrative/pharmacist technician resource and lack of training. However, participants described SMRs as valuable for identifying and addressing unmet needs and supporting holistic, person-centred care across MLTC pathways. ConclusionThe findings demonstrate the need for improved information on SMRs for patients and primary care teams, adequate and appropriate resource allocation, and enhanced support for consultation skills training to optimise medicines use. How this fits in- SMRs were formally introduced to primary care in 2020 to address the challenges of managing polypharmacy in an ageing population with increasing patient complexity and MLTCs. - SMRs were introduced alongside the expansion of clinical pharmacist roles in General Practice as a comprehensive, person-centred review of all a patients medicines. - This qualitative evaluation examines the day-to-day work of implementing and embedding SMRs, highlighting challenges to implementation and integration. - Our findings reveal challenges to the sustainability of SMRs and identify opportunities for optimisation, including addressing pharmacists training needs and resource allocation for administrative and pharmacy technician support.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 95%
- Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing 94%
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 95%
- Integrating primary care and social services for older adults with multimorbidity: A qualitative study 94%
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 98%
- What constitutes 'poor' adherence to medical advice for chronic diseases? Insights from a qualitative study among hypertension and diabetes patients in urban informal settlements, Mumbai Metropolitan Region 94%
- Wading through Molasses: A qualitative examination of the experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of Australian medical practitioners regarding medical billing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of fixed-dose combination treatments for hypertension in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability 95%
- Evaluating the implementation of weekly rifapentine-isoniazid (3HP) for tuberculosis prevention among people living with HIV in Uganda: A qualitative evaluation of the 3HP Options Trial 94%
- A qualitative study on factors influencing health workers’ uptake of a pilot surgical antibiotic prophylaxis stewardship programme in selected Georgian hospitals 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in medication reconciliation interventions between six hospitals: a mixed method study 96%
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 95%
- Educational interventions delivered to prescribing advisers to influence primary care prescribing: a very low-cost pragmatic randomised trial using routine data from OpenPrescribing.net 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.