Modelling maternal cytomegalovirus seroprevalence in Australia using maternal country of birth: Implications for antenatal screening
Marzan, M. B.; Tripathi, T.; Dumville, L.; Watson, J.; Holmes, N.; Hui, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common congenital infection and a leading preventable cause of neurodevelopmental disability. Contemporary maternal CMV seroprevalence estimates are needed to inform antenatal screening policy in Australia. PurposeTo estimate CMV seroprevalence among women referred for antenatal care at a tertiary maternity hospital, identify clinical and sociodemographic associations with serostatus, and model national and hospital-level seroprevalence by maternal country of birth. Materials and MethodsCMV serology results from GP antenatal referrals to a Melbourne tertiary hospital over 13 months were analysed. Seroprevalence was stratified by maternal country of birth, grouped by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) membership. National and hospital-specific seroprevalence were modelled using Australian Bureau of Statistics and research dataset country-of-birth distributions. ResultsOf 4377 referrals, 591 (12.5%) included CMV serology; 61.3% were CMV IgG positive. Median gestational age at testing was 5.4 weeks; referral occurred at a median of 9 weeks. Seroprevalence was higher among women born in non-OECD countries (86.6%) versus OECD countries (54.3%) (adjusted OR 6.44, P<0.001). Modelled national maternal seroprevalence was 63.6%. Across Melbourne public hospitals, estimates ranged from 60% to 74%, reflecting demographic variation. Among 328 women tested for CMV IgM, 17 (5.2%) had positive or equivocal results; one had low avidity IgG, consistent with recent primary infection. ConclusionsMaternal CMV seroprevalence in this cohort is higher than previously reported and strongly associated with maternal country of birth. These data inform evaluation of antenatal CMV screening feasibility and cost-effectiveness studies in Australia.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prevention: perception and willingness of expectant parents in the Netherlands 92%
- Vaccine-preventable diseases other than tuberculosis, and homelessness: A systematic review of the published literature, 1980 to 2020 91%
- Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 IgG response and decay in Canadian healthcare workers: a prospective cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The economic burden of RSV-associated illness in children aged <5 years, South Africa 2011-2016 90%
- Exploring the possible causal role of the immune response to varicella-zoster virus on multiple traits: a phenome-wide Mendelian randomization study 90%
- A phase IV, multi-centre, randomized clinical trial comparing two pertussis-containing vaccines in pregnant women in England and vaccine responses in their infants 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- International healthcare workers’ experiences and perceptions of the 2022 multi-country mpox outbreak 91%
- Cervical Cancer Screening Outcomes for HIV-positive Women in the Lubombo and Manzini regions of Eswatini – Prevalence and Predictors of a Positive Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) Screen 91%
- Risk and rates of hospitalisation in young children: a prospective study of a South African birth cohort 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the clinical severity of the Omicron variant in the Western Cape Province, South Africa, using the diagnostic PCR proxy marker of RdRp target delay to distinguish between Omicron and Delta infections – a survival analysis 93%
- The attributable fraction of respiratory syncytial virus among patients of different age with influenza-like illness and severe acute respiratory illness in a high HIV prevalence setting, South Africa, 2012-2016 92%
- Carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Enterobacterales among pregnant women and newborns in Amhara, Ethiopia 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.