Gaze-related functions driving gaze anchoring in reaching
Fooken, J.; Illamperuma, N. H.; Flanagan, J. R.
Show abstract
In an everyday task, such as planting spring flowers, the eyes typically fixate target objects that we manipulate. When reaching to a target object, gaze shifts away from the reach target to a secondary saccade target, presented during the reach, are delayed until after the reach target has been attained--a phenomenon known as gaze anchoring. Here, we compared gaze anchoring in human participants when reaching to a visual target versus a visual-haptic target providing force feedback upon contact. We also examined gaze anchoring in a bimanual context in which participants were instructed to shift their gaze to the secondary saccade target as soon as it appeared and, at the same time, move their other hand to the secondary saccade target. We found that, during the reaching movement, gaze was anchored to the target for both visual and visual-haptic targets. Whereas in the visual condition gaze appeared to be anchored until the end of the reaching movement, in the visual-haptic condition, gaze appeared to be anchored until the hand was close to the target (i.e., the end of the directing phase). In two-handed reaching, gaze anchoring was observed but anchoring did not extend to the left hand, which started moving before the eyes. Overall, our findings indicate that the timing of eye and hand movements in object manipulation is linked to the function of target fixations. New & NoteworthyWhen reaching to a visual target, humans commonly fixate the target throughout the reaching movement even if a competing visual target appears. Here we show that gaze remains at the reach goal until target attainment has been confirmed visually or until haptic information becomes available to guide target attainment. Whereas the eyes are always anchored to the reach goal, a secondary movement of the non-reaching hand to the competing target can be planned and initiated.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Object motion influences feedforward motor responses during mechanical stopping of virtual projectiles: A preliminary study 97%
- Extended practice improves the accuracy and efficiency of goal-directed reaching guided by supplemental kinesthetic vibrotactile feedback 97%
- Implicit reward-based motor learning 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid eye and hand responses in an interception task are differentially modulated by context-dependent predictability 99%
- Instruction Alters The Influence Of Allocentric Landmarks In A Reach Task 98%
- Target interception in virtual reality is better for natural versus unnatural trajectory shapes and orientations 97%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.