Back

Red List criteria underestimate climate-related extinction risk of range-shifting species

Keuth, R.; Fritz, S. A.; Zurell, D.

2026-01-12 ecology
10.1101/2025.08.20.671260 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Climate change causes global species redistribution and elevates extinction risk, making early identification of vulnerable species critical for timely conservation. The IUCN Red List provides guidelines for assessing climate-related extinction risk using species distribution models (SDMs) and spatially explicit population models (SEPMs). However, a systematic evaluation of these guidelines is currently missing. Using simulations of virtual species with diverse life-history traits and range dynamics, we found that SDMs consistently underestimated extinction risk for range-shifting species. This was due to a concave relationship between population size and habitat loss, which contradicts the linear assumption in the Red List guidelines. For range-contracting species, SDMs provided adequate warning times. Probabilistic extinction estimates from SEPMs provided delayed warning for all species, particularly for highly threatened ones. Our results reveal key limitations of current Red List guidelines under climate change. Based on our findings, we provide tentative recommendations for updating the IUCN Red List guidelines.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.6%
2
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
3
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
5
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
18
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
20
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
25
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%