Back

Synaptic high-frequency jumping synchronises vision to high-speed behaviour

Mansour, N.; Takalo, J.; Kemppainen, J.; Bridges, A. D.; MaBouDi, H.; Bohra, A. A.; Anielska, K.; Vasas, V.; Robert, T.; Yi, B.; Shukla, S.; Zhou, Y.; Kittelmann, M.; Ouwendijk, J.; Mantell, J.; Lawson, M.; Duke, E.; Lazar, A. A.; Verkade, P.; Chittka, L.; Juusola, M.

2025-08-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.20.671248 bioRxiv
Show abstract

During high-speed behaviour, animals must synchronise perception and action despite rapid environmental and self-generated motion. How neural systems achieve such precision remains unclear. Here we show how the housefly (Musca domestica) maintains visual accuracy during fast motion. Using intracellular and photomechanical recordings during saccade-like stimulation, we traced information flow from photoreceptors to large monopolar cells (LMCs). Visual neurons achieved record-high information sampling ([~]2,500 bits{middle dot}s-1) and synaptic transmission ([~]4,100 bits{middle dot}s-1), far exceeding previous estimates. We identify a previously unknown mechanism - synaptic high-frequency jumping - in which photoreceptor-LMC synapses dynamically shift transmission toward higher frequencies during saccades, extending visual bandwidth to [~]1,000 Hz, effectively eliminating synaptic delays, and quadrupling classical flicker-fusion limits ([~]230 Hz). Behavioural experiments show flies respond synchronously within [~]13-20 ms, even before photoreceptor responses peak. A biophysically realistic model reveals how photomechanical-stochastic-refractory quantal sampling co-adapts with saccadic behaviour: through self-motion, flies efficiently translate image motion into temporally-precise, predictive high-speed vision.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.