Back

Research advance: Unexpected plasticity in the life cycle of Trypanosoma brucei

Engstler, M.; Praisler, C.; Lisack, J.; Kreis, A. S.; Hauf, L.; Odenwald, J.; Imdahl, F.

2026-01-07 microbiology
10.1101/2025.08.20.671235 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We have previously shown that the slender form of Trypanosoma (T.) brucei is able to infect teneral tsetse flies, develop to the first fly form, which is the procyclic form, and complete the life cycle in the insect vector (Schuster et al., 2021). Further, analysis of the transmission index (TI; defined as the number of salivary gland infections relative to the number of midgut infections) revealed a higher TI for slender as compared to stumpy forms under laboratory conditions, which included the addition of N-acetyl-glucosamine (NAG) to the infective bloodmeal. These findings challenge the prevailing view of the life cycle, according to which only stumpy forms are considered infective to tsetse flies. Here, we show that slender trypanosomes can infect both male and female tsetse flies, irrespective of their teneral status, in the absence of supplements in the bloodmeal. Additionally, an RNA-sequencing time course was performed on both slender and stumpy cells during their transition into procyclic forms. This analysis revealed that slender and stumpy form trypanosomes remain transcriptionally distinct throughout differentiation into the procyclic form. Furthermore, while the protein associated with differentiation 1 (PAD1) remains essential for the transition, slender cells do not require expression of other hallmark stumpy form traits, such as cell cycle arrest or the shortening of their flagella or microtubule corset. Instead, slender trypanosomes are able to transition directly into procyclic forms. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that while slender cells of T. brucei follow distinct routes to become the procyclic form, they are capable of infecting both teneral and non-teneral tsetse flies, thereby contributing to the transmission and spread of these African parasites.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.3%
2
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.0%
4
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.4%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.8%
6
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cellular Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.7%
9
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
10
Parasitology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
12
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
13
Molecular Microbiology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
International Journal for Parasitology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.9%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Virulence
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Journal of Insect Physiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%