Back

The omnicausal model reveals the highly polyfactorial nature of complex diseases

Marquez-Luna, C.; Tournaire, M.; Rocheleau, G.; Do, R.; Verbanck, M.

2025-08-24 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.08.20.25333988 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mendelian Randomization (MR) is a human genetics method for inferring causal relationships between risk factors and diseases. A common focus of MR studies has been on the causal inference of a single risk factor on a single disease. This has led to the successful discovery of numerous causal risk factors for disease. However, it remains unclear how much each causal risk factor contributes to disease collectively. Here, we introduce the concept of "causality explained", that provides an estimate of the causal variance explained by a phenome-wide set of risk factors on complex diseases to assess how much causality can be potentially explained. The model is based on principal component regression which is a multivariate linear regression based on principal component analysis. In complement, we propose the "polyfactorial index" to assess the trajectory of causality explained as risk factors are sequentially added into the model, to characterize the causal architecture for a complex disease. We demonstrate that our model correctly assesses the causality explained and causal architecture in simulations across a wide range of parameters. To build our model, we used a phenome-wide set of 222 traits from the UK Biobank compared to a set of 5 known risk factors for coronary artery disease. We observed that the phenome-wide set explains almot 45% of causality compared to 28.73% for the set of known risk factors. In addition, we tested our approach on 13 complex diseases and showed that the phenome-wide set can explain between 27% for anorexia to 80% for schizophrenia, with increasing trajectories of causality explained. We propose the "omnicausal model", which posits that a large number of risk factors explains a very small portion individually to disease but collectively explain most of the causal variance. We distinguished core and peripheral causal factors that explain respectively a larger and a smaller part of causal variance. This approach provides insights into the relative importance of individual risk factors as well as the collective impact of multiple causal risk factors on disease, providing insights into the causal architecture of disease.

Published in Genetic Epidemiology (predicted rank #20) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.