Back

Finding ancestry-specific chromatin architecture in Alzheimer's disease

Xu, W.; Wang, L.; LU, L.; Liu, X.; Rajabli, F.; Celis, K.; Gearing, M.; Bennett, D. A.; Flanagan, M.; Weintraub, S.; Geula, C.; Schuck, T.; Williams, S.; Dykxhoorn, D. M.; Griswold, A. J.; Pericak-Vance, M. A.; Young, J.; Jin, F.; Vance, J. M.

2025-08-20 genetics
10.1101/2025.08.19.671054 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genetic risk for Alzheimers Disease (AD) varies across populations. We hypothesized that three-dimensional (3D) genome architecture variations could offer novel epigenetic understanding of ancestry-specific genetic risk. Herein, we performed Hi-C analyses of frontal cortex from APOE {varepsilon}4/{varepsilon}4 individuals with African (AF) or European (EU) ancestry who also had single nuclei ATAC-seq and RNA-seq data available. Ancestry-specific 3D genome architecture was found at both compartment and chromatin loop levels. EU genomes have more active compartments than AF genomes, consistent with our previous report of higher chromatin accessibility in EU than AF genome. Of the over one million chromatin loops identified by the DeepLoop pipeline, we called 12,082 putative EU-specific and 2885 putative AF- specific loops. The AF-specific loops are smaller (median size =158 kb) and likely represent promoter-enhancer interactions, while EU-specific loops are larger (median size = 496 kb) and enriched for CTCF loops. We found that differently expressed genes between AF and EU ancestries were significantly enriched at the putative ancestry-specific loop loci (Fisher-test; p<2.2x10-16; OR=5.13). High confidence HiC-QTLs (N=38) were identified after filtering with CTCF consensus sequence and chromatin accessibility-QTLs. Our study demonstrates variations in 3D genome structure between ancestries, which may contribute to the ancestry-specific genetic risk.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.