Back

Investigating motion-induced signal corruption in steady-state diffusion MRI

Tendler, B. C.; Wu, W.; Miller, K. L.; Hess, A. T.

2025-08-23 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.19.670858 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeDiffusion-weighted steady-state free precession (DW-SSFP) is a diffusion imaging sequence achieving high SNR efficiency. A key challenge for in vivo DW-SSFP is the sequences severe motion sensitivity, currently limiting investigations to low or no motion regimes. Here we establish a framework to both (1) model and (2) correct for the impact of subject motion associated with the underlying magnetisation distribution of DW-SSFP. Theory and MethodsAn extended phase graphs (EPG) representation of the 1D DW-SSFP signal was established incorporating a motion operator describing rigid body and pulsatile motion. The representation was validated using Monte Carlo simulations, and subsequently integrated into a data fitting routine for motion estimation and correction. The fitting routine was evaluated using both simulations and a voxelwise correction applied to in vivo experimental 2D low-resolution single-shot timeseries DW-SSFP data acquired in the human brain in three healthy volunteers, with a tensor reconstructed from the motion-corrected experimental DW-SSFP data. ResultsThe proposed EPG-motion framework gives excellent agreement to complementary Monte Carlo simulations, demonstrating that diffusion coefficient estimation is robust over a range of motion and SNR regimes. Tensor estimates from the motion-corrected experimental DW-SSFP data give good visual agreement to complementary diffusion-weighted spin-echo (DW-SE) data acquired in the same subject, considerably reducing orientation-dependent motion-induced biases. ConclusionTemporal information capturing the evolution of the DW-SSFP signal can be used to retrospectively (1) estimate subject motion and (2) reconstruct motion-corrected DW-SSFP data. Open-source software is provided, facilitating future investigations into the impact of subject-motion on DW-SSFP acquisitions.

Published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.