An optimal transport-based low-dimensional visualization framework for high-parameter flow cytometry
Shemonti, A. S.; Gmyrek, G. B.; Quintelier, K. L. A.; Van Gassen, S.; Saeys, Y.; Willemsen, M.; Aerts, J. G. J. V.; Madsen, E. V. E.; Robinson, J. P.; Pothen, A.; Rajwa, B.
Show abstract
Conventional data visualization techniques in single-cell analysis (such as two-dimensional dot plots, SPADE, PCA, t-SNE, or UMAP) often fall short in providing an intuitive understanding of high-parameter flow cytometry data. These methods tend to oversimplify complex biological relationships, lack biologically meaningful interpretations, and offer no principled framework for downstream quantitative analysis. To address these limitations, we present a graph-based visualization framework grounded in optimal transport theory. In this framework, cell populations are defined by their marker-expression profiles, and inter-population similarity is quantified using an efficiently computable optimal transport formulation known as the Sinkhorn distance. Our approach produces biologically consistent two-dimensional graph layouts using a phenotypeaware Hamming distance. Structural differences between sample graphs are characterized through a customized graph-edit distance that captures changes in population size, marker expression, and relationships between populations. We demonstrate our methods on two flow cytometry datasets: one from a clinical trial of dendritic cell-based immunotherapy in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, involving 14 patients sampled at three time points with 14-color panels, and another from FlowCAP-II, which involved 43 acute myeloid leukemia patient samples analyzed with 7-color panels. Our framework produces robust, quantitative visual summaries of cell populations and supports statistical analysis based on graph edit distances, thereby offering new insights into disease progression and treatment response. Ultimately, our method bridges the gap between flow cytometry data visualization and biological interpretation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Integration, exploration, and analysis of high-dimensional single-cell cytometry data using Spectre 95%
- Visual quality control with CytoMDS, a Bioconductor package for low dimensional representation of cytometry sample distances 95%
- TrackSOM: mapping immune response dynamics through sequential clustering of time- and disease-course single-cell cytometry data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- cytoGPNet: Enhancing Clinical Outcome Prediction Accuracy Using Longitudinal Cytometry Data in Small Cohort Studies 95%
- Knowledge transfer to enhance the performance of deep learning models for automated classification of B-cell neoplasms 94%
- Dimple: An R Package To Quantify, Visualize, And Model Spatial Cellular Interactions From Multiplex Imaging With Distance Matrices 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.