Back

Structure-guided engineering of CCL27 enhances natural ligand CAR T-cells against CCR10 for multiple myeloma

Chilakapati, N.; Patino-Escobar, B.; Chen, E. Y.; Dalal, R.; de Montagnac, J.; Johnson, H.; Kang, A. S.; Akagi, N.; Ramos, E.; Phojanakong, P.; Salangsang, F.; Zeng, Y.; Chari, A.; Chung, A.; Kumar, A. D.; Martin, T. G.; Shy, B. R.; Steri, V.; Karlon, W. J.; Kortemme, T.; Barwick, B. G.; Wiita, A. P.

2025-08-23 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.08.19.670119 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the success of BCMA CAR-Ts, many multiple myeloma patients relapse and require additional therapeutic options. Our group previously identified the chemokine receptor CCR10 as a potential alternate target to address this need. Here, we validated CCR10 expression on primary myeloma tumors and sought to develop CAR T-cells against CCR10, utilizing its natural ligand CCL27 as a CAR binding element. However, CARs based on the native CCL27 sequence were ineffective. We thus utilized computational modeling and structure-guided engineering to inform rational mutations along the CCL27-CCR10 interface, exploiting a hydrophobic pocket on CCR10. This effort identified CCL27 mutants with an additional N-terminal aromatic amino acid that dramatically improved the efficacy of CCL27-based CAR-Ts to near that of current anti-BCMA CAR-Ts. We validated key amino acid contacts at the CCL27-CCR10 interface, which contribute to increased CAR binding avidity, predicted to be influenced by increased Van der Waals interactions. Lastly, we found that the CCL27 mutants have no toxicity in the hematopoietic compartment. This work illustrates the potential of engineering natural ligand CAR-Ts beyond their wild-type sequences and underscores the translational potential of engineered CCL27 mutant CAR-Ts.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.