Back

Wearable tracking of walking and non-walking as progression markers in early Parkinson's disease

Ho, K. C.; Li, S.; Serrano Amenos, C.; Kowahl, N.; Rainaldi, E.; Chen, C.; Bloem, B. R.; Sanders, L. H.; Shih, L. C.; Siderowf, A.; Marks, W. J.; Kapur, R.; Evers, L. J. W.; Shin, S.

2025-08-21 neurology
10.1101/2025.08.19.25333986 medRxiv
Show abstract

IMPORTANCEWearable-based measures of walking (as proxy for physical activity) may quantify disease progression and modification thereof in early-stage Parkinsons disease (PD). OBJECTIVESEstablishing the validity of digital measures of walking and non-walking in PD. DESIGNRetrospective longitudinal analyses of data from cohorts within 3 larger studies, consisting of wearable sensor, demographic, and clinical data collected during 2017-2023, with 1-2 year follow up. SETTINGThree independent multicenter cohort studies. PARTICIPANTSPeople with PD, and age/sex matched non-PD cohort. EXPOSURESNone. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESDigital measures test-retest reliability, analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients across consecutive monthly-aggregated data. Digital measures sensitivity: ability to detect within-participant changes, analyzed over 24 months using linear mixed-effect models, and analyzed as effect-size changes-from-baseline comparing 1- and 2-year longitudinal Cohens-d (mean and 95% CIs) vs conventional clinical endpoints. Analyses replicated in two independent PD cohorts (internal validation and external evaluation). Compared within-participant changes between PD and non-PD cohorts using linear mixed-effect model slopes. RESULTSWe analyzed 57 digital measures (51 individual, 6 composite) in a development cohort (N=171), selecting 32 (26 individual, 6 composite) for further study based on their sensitivity and test-retest reliability. During internal validation (N=101), 20 measures could detect statistically significant within-participant changes and 7 showed larger 2-year effect-size changes than conventional clinical measures; non-walking bout (NWB) duration (12.4% yearly change; 2-year Cohens-d 0.623 [95% CI: 0.461,0.811]) and 95th percentile of NWB duration (17.1% yearly change; 2-year Cohens-d, 0.623 [95% CI: 0.461,0.811]) performed best. Measures could detect significant and persisting changes from baseline at 10 months. During external evaluation (N=67), 15 measures could detect statistically significant within-participant changes and 12 showed larger 1-year effect-size changes than conventional clinical measures; 12 measures showed significantly greater change in people with PD than in matched non-PD individuals (N=171). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCEInternal validation and external evaluation of 32 digital measures that quantified walking and non-walking behaviors in patients with early-stage PD showed that they could have greater sensitivity to detect longitudinal changes than conventional measures, and that these changes were disease-specific (e.g., separate from aging), making them candidates for disease-specific progression markers. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSCan wearable sensor-based digital measures of physical activity and mobility serve as markers of disease progression in early-stage Parkinsons disease (PD)? FindingsIn two independent longitudinal cohorts of people with PD, digital measures detected statistically-significant changes in walking and non-walking behaviors after 1 and 2 years of follow-up; additionally, a comparison between people with and without PD (from a third cohort) showed that these changes were disease-specific. Compared with MDS-UPDRS-based conventional metrics, measures of non-walking behavior showed greater effect size (such as mean non-walking bout duration, with an annual increase of 12.4% and a 2-year Cohens-d of 0.623). MeaningWearable sensor-based digital measures can detect and quantify disease-specific changes in walking and non-walking behaviors over time in people with early-stage PD.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Journal of Parkinson's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.2%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.8%
5
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
7
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.3%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
12
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
13
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
18
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
22
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%