Back

Projected cumulative lifetime earnings of physicians

Zaorsky, N. G.; Lin, C.; Mani, K.; Spratt, D. E.; Dahle, J.; Wang, M.

2025-08-21 health economics
10.1101/2025.08.19.25333972 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeThe estimated lifetime earnings of physicians are multifactorial and have not been extensively modeled. This study projects and compares lifetime earnings of US-based physicians across different career pathways. MethodsWe developed a customizable model to estimate physician lifetime earnings using data from the publicly available 2016-17 Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) survey results across variable undergraduate training time, MD/DO vs MD-PhD degree programs, attending practice settings, state income tax levels during attending practice, loan repayment options, and promotion timeline. Post-tax earnings were calculated using U.S. tax codes and specialty-specific salary data. We created an interactive web-based interactive application using R Shiny to simulate individualized financial projections. App: https://physician-lifetime-earnings.shinyapps.io/physician-lifetime-earnings/. ResultsThe median cumulative lifetime earnings averaged across 19 specialties was $6,509,474. Specifically, the average was $5,167,507 across primary care specialties (family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics) and $7,696,166 across all specialties excluding primary care. Pursuing two paid undergraduate gap years (vs zero) resulted in a weighted average 5.2% (IQR: 5.2, 5.7) decrease in cumulative lifetime earnings, private practice (vs academia) resulted in a 14.7% (IQR: 8.9, 22.4) increase, and repaying loans at 30% of income (vs obtaining Public Service Loan Forgiveness) resulted in a 6.1% (IQR: 3.0, 6.5) decrease. Completing one undergraduate gap year (vs zero), a combined MD-PhD degree (vs MD/DO alone), and accelerated academic promotion at eight years to full professor (vs 14) all had minimal impact on cumulative lifetime earnings (< 3%). ConclusionWe created a model to compare the lifetime earnings of US-based physicians across different career pathways.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.