Projected cumulative lifetime earnings of physicians
Zaorsky, N. G.; Lin, C.; Mani, K.; Spratt, D. E.; Dahle, J.; Wang, M.
Show abstract
PurposeThe estimated lifetime earnings of physicians are multifactorial and have not been extensively modeled. This study projects and compares lifetime earnings of US-based physicians across different career pathways. MethodsWe developed a customizable model to estimate physician lifetime earnings using data from the publicly available 2016-17 Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) survey results across variable undergraduate training time, MD/DO vs MD-PhD degree programs, attending practice settings, state income tax levels during attending practice, loan repayment options, and promotion timeline. Post-tax earnings were calculated using U.S. tax codes and specialty-specific salary data. We created an interactive web-based interactive application using R Shiny to simulate individualized financial projections. App: https://physician-lifetime-earnings.shinyapps.io/physician-lifetime-earnings/. ResultsThe median cumulative lifetime earnings averaged across 19 specialties was $6,509,474. Specifically, the average was $5,167,507 across primary care specialties (family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics) and $7,696,166 across all specialties excluding primary care. Pursuing two paid undergraduate gap years (vs zero) resulted in a weighted average 5.2% (IQR: 5.2, 5.7) decrease in cumulative lifetime earnings, private practice (vs academia) resulted in a 14.7% (IQR: 8.9, 22.4) increase, and repaying loans at 30% of income (vs obtaining Public Service Loan Forgiveness) resulted in a 6.1% (IQR: 3.0, 6.5) decrease. Completing one undergraduate gap year (vs zero), a combined MD-PhD degree (vs MD/DO alone), and accelerated academic promotion at eight years to full professor (vs 14) all had minimal impact on cumulative lifetime earnings (< 3%). ConclusionWe created a model to compare the lifetime earnings of US-based physicians across different career pathways.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel decision modeling framework for health policy analyses when outcomes are influenced by social and disease processes 90%
- Forecasting local surges in COVID-19 hospitalizations through adaptive decision tree classifiers 90%
- Pricing Treatments Cost-Effectively When They Have Multiple Indications: Not Just a Simple Threshold Analysis 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of the Health Economics Portfolio Funded by the National Institutes of Health in Response to Published Guidance 92%
- Title-Impact of combined medication payment management policies on population health performance 91%
- Investigating Ethical Tradeoffs in Crisis Standards of Care through Simulation of Ventilator Allocation Protocols 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Balancing revenue generation with capacity generation: Case distribution, financial impact and hospital capacity changes from cancelling or resuming elective surgeries in the US during COVID-19 92%
- Measurement Matters: Changing Penalty Calculations under the Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) Cost Hospitals Millions 91%
- Spatio-temporal modelling of referrals to outpatient respiratory clinics in the integrated care system of the Morecambe Bay area, England 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Amortization of Funding Gene Therapies: Making the “Intangibles” Tangible for Patients 92%
- Do Faster-Trained Physicians Fill the Gaps? Geographic Concentration of Emergency Medicine physicians with different postgraduate training in Ontario Canada 91%
- A novel methodology to measure waiting times for community-based specialist care in a public healthcare system 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of individual and ensemble probabilistic forecasts of COVID-19 mortality in the US 88%
- Estimates of Actual and Potential Lives Saved in the United States from the use of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma 87%
- Does Contact Tracing Work? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from an Excel Error in England 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.