Back

High-Throughput Screening and Initial SAR Studies Identify a Novel Sub-micromolar Potent Human cGAS Inhibitor

Alarcon-Esposito, J.; Nagiri, R. K.; Wang, S.; Larson, C.; Carvallo-Torres, L.; Singh, V. K.; Gan, L.; Sinha, S. C.

2025-08-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.18.670979 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) has emerged as a promising therapeutic target of several human diseases, including Alzheimers disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative disorders. As a cytosolic DNA sensor, cGAS generates an innate immune response to promote neuroinflammation by producing an endogenous agonist of the stimulator of interferon genes (STING), 23-cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP), which activates the cGAS-STING pathway. We have performed a high-throughput screening of a chemical library containing over 300K small molecules at the Fisher Drug Discovery Resource Center (DDRC), Rockefeller University (RU), to identify multiple hit inhibitors of human (h)-cGAS. We used a modified Kinase Glo(R) Luminescent Kinase assay, which was earlier developed at RU and later used by multiple groups, including ours, to perform primary screening of the library using h-cGAS. The hit candidates bearing novel scaffolds are structurally diverse and exhibited in vitro activity in the low micromolar range. RU-0610270 or compound (cpd) 1, a sulfonamide derivative, is one of the most potent hits (IC50=1.88 {micro}M), selected for hit expansion and structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis. We synthesized new analogs of cpd 1 and evaluated them in vitro against h-cGAS to identify cpd 6 (IC50=0.66 {micro}M) as the most potent hit analog. We further profiled cpd 6 and found that it modestly inhibited cGAMP levels by 29% at 30 {micro}M in THP1 cells without detectable toxicity, and by 76% at 100 {micro}M, albeit with a moderate decrease ([~]20%) in cell viability. These results highlight a novel chemical series with promising in vitro activity, providing a starting point for the development of selective and potent human cGAS inhibitors for clinical use.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
2
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
4
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
5
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
8
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
9
Chemical Communications
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
10
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
12
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
13
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.5%
15
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
17
Nature Chemistry
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
18
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
20
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
22
JACS Au
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
24
RSC Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Chemistry
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%
27
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%