Back

Massively Parallel Screens Reveal Factors Influencing the Activity of a Diversity-Generating Retroelement Reconstituted in Escherichia coli

Unlu, I.; Smiley, M. K.; Potapov, V.; Renoux-Martin, Y.; Sun, Z.-Y.; Lim, H. C.

2025-08-19 microbiology
10.1101/2025.08.18.670894 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Certain phages and microbes use Diversity-Generating Retroelements (DGRs) for targeted adaptation via a process called mutagenic retrohoming. This process relies on an error-prone reverse transcriptase that specifically misincorporates bases opposite adenines in the RNA template. The resulting mutagenized complementary DNA then integrates into a homologous target gene to introduce mutations at adenine residues. Although the functions of core DGR components are well-defined, we still dont know how other cellular factors influence their activity. To address this, we reconstituted the DGR from the Bordetella phage BPP-1 in Escherichia coli. Our systematic analysis uncovered several cellular factors that influence its activity. By sequencing the cDNA, we discovered the reverse transcriptase is particularly mutagenic in the 5-AAC-3 and 5-ACC-3 contexts, which explains their abundance in natural DGR templates. A transposon sequencing screen identified both positive and negative regulators, including the single-stranded DNA exonuclease ExoI, which unexpectedly inhibits DGR activity through a nuclease-independent mechanism. Using a massively parallel reporter assay, we found that DGR preferentially edits targets located near the replication origin and co-directionally oriented with replication. In the preferred orientation, the target sequence is located on the lagging-strand template, where the extended single-stranded DNA gap likely facilitates base pairing with the incoming complementary DNA. Collectively, these findings advance our understanding of how DGRs function within the cellular context and enabled a 1000-fold improvement in editing efficiency, establishing a foundation for future targeted-mutagenesis applications.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.