Disparities in Quality of Healthcare between Asian and White Children with Special Health Care Needs from 2016-2020
Van, K. K.; Chen, C.-C.; Son, E.; Brown, R. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundApproximately one in five families in the United States have a child with a special healthcare need (CSHCN). Previous research has shown significant inequalities in health care quality, access, satisfaction, and outcomes of Asian compared to White individuals. There is limited research currently available exploring disparities in health care quality at the intersection of race and CSHCN complexity for Asian versus White children. ObjectiveThe goal of this study is to understand how race, household language, poverty, family structure, and complexity of healthcare needs affect the quality of health care received by Asian and White CSHCNs. MethodData was obtained from the 2016-2020 National Survey of Childrens Health. Five multivariate ordinal regression analyses were performed to explore the predictors of parents perceptions of healthcare quality across five domains: time spent with the child, doctor listening to parent concerns, doctor being sensitive to family values/customs, doctor providing needed information, and doctor partnering with the family in their childs care. ResultsResults show that Asian parents with CHSCNs report lower quality care than White parents with CSHCNs. However, quality of care dropped for high complexity CSHCN regardless of race. Significant covariates included language barriers, socioeconomic factors, and cultural differences. ConclusionAsian CSHCNs experience disparities in healthcare quality, access, and utilization compared to their White counterparts. The results from this study suggest the need to examine subgroup differences and develop effective intervention strategies to ensure equitable care for everyone, especially CSHCN with high complex needs.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Dissatisfaction with family members’ medical care: the relationship with trust in personal physicians and physicians generally in Japan 93%
- Navigating uncertain illness trajectories for young children with serious infectious illness: a mixed-methods modified grounded theory study 93%
- Health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care: A systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sources of Successful Participant Engagement in a Public Health Research Study: a Focus on a Latino Community 92%
- How a year of pandemic and related public health measures impacted youth and young adults and the foundations they build upon: Qualitative interviews in Ontario Canada 92%
- What matters to patients?: a timely question for Value Based Care 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Willing but Unable: Physicians’ Referral Knowledge as Barriers to Abortion Care 91%
- Financial Hardship and Social Assistance as Determinants of Mental Health and Food and Housing Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic 89%
- How does the local area deprivation influence life chances for children in poverty in Wales: A record linkage cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Listening to older voices: Results of a cross-sectional survey of older patient-reported experiences of facility-based healthcare in Nouna, Burkina Faso 92%
- Sources of Stress and Coping Mechanisms: Experiences of Maternal Health Care Providers in Western Kenya 92%
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding the influence of leadership, organisation, and policy on delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 91%
- Long-term Public Healthcare Burden Associated with Intimate Partner Violence among Canadian Women: A Cohort Study 90%
- Staff experiences and perspectives of delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.