Back

Thinging Through Modelling. Active Inference Meets Material Engagement

Di Paolo, L. D.; Vindrola-Padros, B.; Clark, A.; Constant, A.

2025-08-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.17.670756 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In this simulation study, we adopt the comprehensive neurocomputational approach of Active Inference (AIF) to illustrate some key concepts of Material Engagement Theory (MET) [1]. MET posits that craftwork does not require, or rely on, rich internal pre-planning, i.e., complex and highly detailed representations that occur mainly in the makers head. Instead, the maker engages materiality through thinging, where the human agent (the maker) is guided by and leverages the materiality of the artefact (such as a spinning of clay or a chunk of marble). MET assigns a crucial co-participatory role to materiality, attributing agency to it. We investigate METs claims through the widely adopted theory of AIF [2]. Our first aim is to simulate the plausibility of the (creative) thinging, adopting a simple modelling scenario. Then, we also discuss its applicability to other, more complex cases, which seem to require greater levels of pre-thinking (e.g., planning, imagining and conceptualising outcomes). We highlight how these cases, too, align with the general principle of thinging. With our AIF neurocomputational understanding, we explain that even in these situations, the predictive brains involved in the creative process attempt to minimise the complexity of their internal model. The upshot of this is that, always and everywhere, our human minds engage the materiality to make the most of the characteristic dynamics of the world surrounding us - things and processes alike.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
5
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
7
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.2%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
11
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
Neural Computation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Biosystems
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
29
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%