Back

Rapid turnover and recurrent structural variation at the 17q21.31 locus in modern and ancient human genomes, and primates

Sridharan, S.; Lou, R. N.; Ferguson, S.; Rocha, J.; Mitchell, M.; Kililia, A.; Borda, V.; Medina-Munoz, S. G.; Gravel, S.; Henn, B.; Sudmant, P. H.

2025-08-15 genomics
10.1101/2025.08.15.670618 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The 17q21.31 locus in humans harbors several complex structural haplotypes including a [~]970kb inversion. Different inversion haplotypes have been associated with susceptibility to microdeletions causing Koolen-de Vries syndrome and variation in fecundity and recombination rates. Here, using 210 haplotype-resolved human genome assemblies and pangenome graph-based approaches we characterize 11 distinct structural haplotypes, several of which have not been previously described. Extending our analyses to a set of haplotype-resolved great-ape genomes, we characterize the structure of an independent inversion in chimpanzees which extends an additional 650kb, encompasses 5 additional genes, and is [~]2 million years younger than the human inversion. We further determine that gorillas exhibit an independent duplication of the KANSL1 gene which may predispose them to Koolen-de Vries syndrome causing microdeletions. Using short read sequencing data we characterize 17q21.31 haplotype diversity worldwide in [~]5174 individuals from 107 populations finding increased frequencies of KANSL1 duplication-containing haplotypes in both European and South Asian populations as well as 8 double recombination events between inverted and non-inverted haplotypes ranging in size from 20-180kb. Finally, using 626 ancient Eurasian human genomes we show the frequency of haplotypes containing KANSL1 duplications has increased [~]6-fold over the past 12 thousand years in Europe. Together, our results highlight the dynamics, complexity, and recurrent, independent evolution of a medically relevant locus across humans and great apes.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.