Back

A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Dyspnea with Noninvasive Biomarkers

Mkrtchyan, K. G.; Qazi, A.; Lonh, B.; Dong, A.; Ramirez, G. O.; Eskandari, M.; Ma, S.; Li, W. V.; Heinrich, E. C.

2025-08-21 physiology
10.1101/2025.08.15.669955 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RationaleDyspnea is the subjective sensation of breathing discomfort. This symptom is highly prevalent in patients with chronic and critical illness, and its presence is associated with poor clinical outcomes and long-term psychological trauma. The multidimensional nature of the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying dyspnea, paired with individual variation in its presentation, makes identifying and monitoring this symptom difficult, particularly in non-communicative patients. ObjectiveUndetected and untreated dyspnea in critically ill patients is a significant problem contributing to patient suffering. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of machine learning methods for assessing and continuously monitoring dyspnea using easily obtained noninvasive biomarkers. MethodsWe recruited healthy participants (N = 60, 35 women) and stimulated dyspnea using a forced end-tidal semi-rebreathing circuit to modulate arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide levels while collecting non-invasive biomarker data and continuous self-reported dyspnea severity scores. This data was used to train machine-learning models to predict the presence or absence of significant dyspnea (Numeric Rating Scale [≥] 3). We then compared the performance of our final model to observational estimates by trained healthcare providers. Measurements and Main ResultsThe final model (Random Forest) performed well (PR-AUC=0.832) and exceeded the accuracy of observation estimates made on the same participants using the Respiratory Distress Observational Scale (RDOS) (accuracy=54%). ConclusionsThese results indicate that machine learning models can utilize non-invasive biomarker inputs to accurately predict carbon dioxide- and hypoxia-induced dyspnea in a healthy population during spontaneous breathing.

Published in Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.