A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Dyspnea with Noninvasive Biomarkers
Mkrtchyan, K. G.; Qazi, A.; Lonh, B.; Dong, A.; Ramirez, G. O.; Eskandari, M.; Ma, S.; Li, W. V.; Heinrich, E. C.
Show abstract
RationaleDyspnea is the subjective sensation of breathing discomfort. This symptom is highly prevalent in patients with chronic and critical illness, and its presence is associated with poor clinical outcomes and long-term psychological trauma. The multidimensional nature of the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying dyspnea, paired with individual variation in its presentation, makes identifying and monitoring this symptom difficult, particularly in non-communicative patients. ObjectiveUndetected and untreated dyspnea in critically ill patients is a significant problem contributing to patient suffering. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of machine learning methods for assessing and continuously monitoring dyspnea using easily obtained noninvasive biomarkers. MethodsWe recruited healthy participants (N = 60, 35 women) and stimulated dyspnea using a forced end-tidal semi-rebreathing circuit to modulate arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide levels while collecting non-invasive biomarker data and continuous self-reported dyspnea severity scores. This data was used to train machine-learning models to predict the presence or absence of significant dyspnea (Numeric Rating Scale [≥] 3). We then compared the performance of our final model to observational estimates by trained healthcare providers. Measurements and Main ResultsThe final model (Random Forest) performed well (PR-AUC=0.832) and exceeded the accuracy of observation estimates made on the same participants using the Respiratory Distress Observational Scale (RDOS) (accuracy=54%). ConclusionsThese results indicate that machine learning models can utilize non-invasive biomarker inputs to accurately predict carbon dioxide- and hypoxia-induced dyspnea in a healthy population during spontaneous breathing.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using simple patient-reported symptoms and cough feature analysis: A diagnostic agreement study 95%
- A comprehensive ML-based Respiratory Monitoring System for Physiological Monitoring & Resource Planning in the ICU 95%
- Passive Detection of COVID-19 with Wearable Sensors and Explainable Machine Learning Algorithms 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Imputation of PaO2 from SpO2 values from the MIMIC-III Critical Care Database Using Machine-Learning Based Algorithms 95%
- Kinematic signature of high-risk labored breathing revealed by novel signal analysis 94%
- Performance of EasyBreath ® Decathlon Snorkeling mask for Delivering Continuous Positive Airway Pressure 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hemodynamic profiles by non-invasive monitoring of cardiac index and vascular tone in acute heart failure patients in the emergency department: external validation and clinical outcomes 93%
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 93%
- Computational simulation to assess patient safety of uncompensated COVID-19 two-patient ventilator sharing using the Pulse Physiology Engine 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- AlveolEye: Rapid and precise lung morphometry guided by computer vision 91%
- Recapitulation of Human Pathophysiology and Identification of Forensic Biomarkers in a Translational Swine Model of Chlorine Inhalation Injury 89%
- Repetitive Sulfur Dioxide Exposure in Mice Models Post-Deployment Respiratory Syndrome 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning Prediction of Biomarkers from Echocardiogram Videos 89%
- Daily variation in blood glucose levels during continuous enteral nutrition in patients on the Intensive Care Unit: a retrospective observational study 89%
- Transformer-based deep learning model for the diagnosis of suspected lung cancer in primary care based on electronic health record data 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.