Liquefied Petroleum Gas or Biomass for Cooking and Effects on Blood Pressure: Results from the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network (HAPIN) Trial
Peel, J. L.; Chang, H. H.; Steenland, K.; Underhill, L. J.; Ye, W.; Balakrishnan, K.; Diaz-Artiga, A.; McCracken, J. P.; Rosa, G.; Thompson, L. M.; Aravindalochanan, V.; Barr, D. B.; Castanaza, A.; Chen, Y.; Chiang, M.; Clark, M. L.; Davila-Roman, V. G.; de las Fuentes, L.; Garg, S. S.; Hartinger, S. M.; Harvey, S. A.; Hossen, S.; Jabbarzadeh, S.; Johnson, M. A.; Kim, D.-Y.; Kirby, M. A.; Lovvorn, A. E.; McCollum, E. D.; Moulton, L. H.; Mukeshimana, A.; Mukhopadhyay, K.; Naeher, L. P.; Ndagijimana, F.; Nicolaou, L.; Ntivuguruzwa, J. d. D.; Piedrahita, R.; Pillarisetti, A.; Puttaswamy, N.; Rama
Show abstract
BackgroundExposure to household air pollution from burning coal and biomass for cooking is associated with higher blood pressure and other adverse indicators of cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of death worldwide. Evidence demonstrating that switching from biomass to liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) will reduce blood pressure is limited. MethodsAs part of a larger trial of 3200 households, we conducted a randomized trial of 342 women aged 40 to 79 years who lived in households using biomass for cooking in rural areas of Guatemala, India, Peru, and Rwanda to assess the effects of a free LPG stove and fuel intervention. Systolic blood pressure (one of four primary outcomes) was measured once prior to randomization and up to five times after randomization over 18 months. ResultsA total of 418 participants were randomized (n=209 to intervention, and n=209 to control). Mean (standard deviation) systolic blood pressure at baseline was 112.7 (14.9) mmHg and 112.6 (14.7) mmHg in intervention and control participants, respectively. Adherence within the intervention arm was high. Among the 342 participants with a valid baseline and at least one valid post-randomization blood pressure measurement, mean (SD) post-randomization average systolic blood pressure was 111.5 (13.2) mmHg in the intervention arm and 111.9 (12.5) mmHg in the control arm, with an adjusted mean of difference of - 0.56 mmHg (95% confidence interval, -2.19 to 1.07, p-value = 0.50). ConclusionsWe did not observe evidence that an 18-month LPG stove and fuel intervention reduced blood pressure in women.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-sectional association of blood pressure variability and night-time dipping with cardiac structure in adolescents 93%
- Socioeconomic Differentials in Hypertension based on JNC7 and ACC/AHA 2017 Guidelines Mediated by Body Mass Index: Evidence from Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 93%
- Alpha globin gene copy number and hypertension risk among Black Americans 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tuberculosis infection and hypertension: Prevalence estimates from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 92%
- Changes in Cardiovascular Disease Risk, Lung Function, and Other Clinical Health Outcomes When People Who Smoke Use E-cigarettes to Reduce Cigarette Smoking: An Exploratory Analysis from a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 92%
- Heritability of cardiovascular health across three generations in South Africa: the Birth to Twenty-Plus cohort 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of a Text Message Intervention Promoting Seat Belt Use Among Targeted Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial 90%
- Corticosteroids in COVID-19: Optimizing Observational Research through Target Trial Emulations 89%
- Venous Thromboembolism and the Effects of Statin and Hormone Therapy: A Case-Control Study of 250,000 Women 50-64 years of age 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of leveraging existing HIV primary health systems and community health workers for hypertension screening and treatment in Africa: an individual-based modelling study 90%
- Robust causal inference for long-term policy decisions: cost effectiveness of interventions for obesity using Mendelian randomization 89%
- Differential impact of Covid-19 on incidence of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases in acute, post-acute and long Covid-19: population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rationale and design of the Learning Implementation of Guideline-based decision support system for Hypertension Treatment (LIGHT) Trial and LIGHT-ACD Trial 93%
- The iHealth-T2D study: Statistical analysis plan for a cluster randomised controlled trial with intensive family-based lifestyle modification programme to reduce type 2 diabetes risk amongst South Asians 90%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.