Back

Hormonal contraceptive drug use trends in the Estonian Biobank

Dzigurski, J.; Möls, M.; Läll, K.; Currant, H.; Eltermaa, M.; Estonian Biobank Research Team, ; Mägi, R.; Milani, L.; Laisk, T.

2025-08-19 sexual and reproductive health
10.1101/2025.08.15.25333767 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceHormonal contraceptives (HCs) support reproductive goals and alleviate symptoms of gynaecological conditions for millions of women. Despite widespread use, individual long-term HC use trends, medication switching, and impact of genetics on HC side effects remain uncharacterised. ObjectiveTo study HC use trends among Estonian Biobank (EstBB) participants, compare with national statistics, and evaluate suitability of EstBB for studying genetic risk for HC side effects. DesignLongitudinal descriptive analysis of HC refill data collected from 2004-2022 and user profiles, integrating demographic, genetic, and electronic health records data. SettingVolunteer-based longitudinal cohort representing 20% of Estonian adult population, where participants signed broad informed consent. ParticipantsWomen aged 15-55 in 2004-2022 with complete health and medication history available through linked electronic health records. ExposureHC use defined as prescription and purchase of drugs of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) coding system level 3 G02B and G03A, and ATC level 5 G03HB01 during follow-up. Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary measures included age-stratified annual HC users prevalence rates, inferred HC usage period duration, switching frequencies, and user profiles. Secondary measures included HC use during COVID-19 period, and genetic and health-relatedthromboembolism risk factors. ResultsOver 19-year study period, twenty HC formulations with five administration routes (intrauterine device, ring, pill, patch and implant) were used by 73,071 women (mean age at joining EstBB (sd) = 35.6 (10.6)). Comparable to the Estonian population, combined HCs dominated, while progestin-only HC use increased with age and time. Next, 64.3% of users switched formulations at least once, with 17.7% being rapid switchers. Rapid switchers showed side effect-related diagnoses before switching, indicating the datasets potential for studying genetic risk of side effects. Medical abortion overlapped with inferred usage periods in 3.2% of users, suggesting contraceptive failure. Finally, 5.3% of HC users carried at least one VTE-associated genetic variant, and 1.5% of carriers developed thromboembolism during inferred HC use. Conclusions and RelevanceThese HC use trajectories, consistent with population statistics, provide insights into real-world use patterns, offering additional context and support for understanding prescription trends, womens preferences, as well as HC effectiveness and safety. Moreover, EstBB dataset has potential for genetic analyses of HC use and associated side effects. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=131 SRC="FIGDIR/small/25333767v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (43K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@83874eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12833fforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6dcfdeorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16a3075_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Published in PLOS Medicine (predicted rank #21) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.0%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.0%
4
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.4%
5
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
7
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Sexually Transmitted Infections
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.8%
12
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.8%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
Tropical Medicine & International Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
PLOS Medicine · published here
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.0%
24
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%