Back

Effect of COVID-19 lockdown on sleep quality, sleep duration, and acute stress in Indian young adults

Soni, R.; Gupta, I.; Qureshi, S.; Akhtar, N.

2025-08-19 public and global health
10.1101/2025.08.15.25333638 medRxiv
Show abstract

The COVID-19 lockdown brought disruptions to daily life and social schedules which influenced sleep and stress. Young adults, already vulnerable to irregular sleep patterns and heightened psychological stress, may have experienced notable shifts in sleep quality, duration, and circadian alignment during this period. Seventy-nine urban young adults (18-25 years) provided matched pre-lockdown and during-lockdown data via an online survey. Measures included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Berlin Questionnaire for OSA risk, the National Stressful Events Survey Acute Stress Disorder Short Scale (NSESS-S), and self-reported height and weight for BMI. Social jet lag was derived from sleep timing. Within-participant changes were tested using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests; univariate and multivariate logistic regressions identified predictors of OSA risk. No significant changes were observed in PSQI scores, subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, acute stress, or social jet lag during lockdown. Sleep duration increased slightly, and BMI and social jet lag showed small numerical rises without statistical significance. OSA risk was positively associated with acute stress (p < 0.001), higher BMI (p < 0.05), and poor sleep quality (p < 0.001). In multivariate models, poor sleep quality was the strongest independent predictor of OSA risk, followed by acute stress and BMI. Lifestyle factors, including physical activity, screen time, and ambient noise, showed no significant associations. Flexible schedules during lockdown may have offset expected negative impacts on sleep and stress in this demographic. The strong links between OSA risk, poor sleep quality, and acute stress highlight the need for integrated behavioural and physiological approaches to sleep health in young adults.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.6%
3
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
6
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
15
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
16
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
24
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%