Back

The development of FEDUPP: Feeding Experimentation Device Users Processing Package to Assess Learning and Cognitive Flexibility

Yao, M.; Libster, A. M.; Desfor, S.; Malhotra, F.; Castorena, N.; Montilla-Perez, P.; Telese, F.

2025-08-20 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2025.08.14.670424 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cognitive flexibility, the ability to adapt behavior in response to changing contingencies, is a key component of adaptive decision-making and is impaired in multiple neuropsychiatric disorders. Traditional rodent assays of cognitive flexibility are conducted in experimenter-controlled sessions in restrictive environments, limiting ecological validity and temporal resolution. Here, we developed a fully automated, home-cage paradigm using the Feeding Experimentation Device 3 (FED3) and a companion open-source analysis pipeline, the Feeding Experimentation Device Users Processing Package (FEDUPP), to assess learning and cognitive flexibility with minimal experimenter intervention. The paradigm combines a single-day fixed-ratio 1 (FR1) task with a multi-day, reversal learning task in which active port assignment switches every 25 pellets collected. FEDUPP implements multi-scale learning metrics, including overall accuracy, an 80% accuracy milestone, and a machine learning-based classification of meal accuracy to capture motivated, goal-directed feeding. In wild-type mice, the paradigm detected rapid FR1 acquisition and progressive within-block adaptation during reversal. Application to mice with dorsal hippocampal knockdown of the scaffolding protein CASK revealed faster FR1 acquisition and higher accuracy than controls but a delayed onset of the first accurate meal after reversal, suggesting a selective deficit in updating goal-directed feeding behavior. These findings demonstrate that FEDUPP enables high-resolution, continuous assessment of learning and cognitive flexibility in ethologically relevant settings, and that meal-based accuracy provides a sensitive metric for detecting subtle flexibility impairments not captured by traditional measures.

Published in Translational Psychiatry · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 2%
18.9%
3
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.5%
6
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.4%
7
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
8
Animal Cognition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
12
Lab Animal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.5%
16
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.1%
19
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
22
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
23
Genes, Brain and Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%