Back

Comparative characterization of Cas12f orthologs reveals mechanistic features underlying enhanced genome editing efficiency

Guan, K.; Fregoso Ocampo, R.; Matheus Carnevali, P. B.; Castelle, C. J.; Gonzalez-Osorio, L.; Castanzo, D. T.; Brothers, M.; Dangerfield, T. L.; Hooper, M. M.; Appleby, N.; Krudop, I.; Lamothe, R. C.; Aliaga Goltsman, D. S.; Alexander, L. M.; Butterfield, C. N.; Johnson, K. A.; Brown, C. T.; Taylor, D. W.

2025-08-14 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.08.14.670346 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Miniature CRISPR-Cas12f nucleases are attractive candidates for therapeutic genome editing owing to their compact size and compatibility with adeno-associated virus (AAV) delivery. However, editing efficiencies in mammalian cells are lower than those of larger systems such as Cas12a and SpCas9. The extensive phylogenetic diversity of Cas12f suggests unexplored mechanistic variation with the potential for optimization. Here, we characterize a naturally occurring Cas12f ortholog discovered through metagenomics, Cas12f-MG119-28, which supports robust genome editing in human cells. Through structural, biochemical, and kinetic analyses, we compare Cas12f-MG119-28 with two recently described orthologs, Oscillibacter sp. Cas12f (OsCas12f) and Ruminiclostridium herbifermentans Cas12f (RhCas12f). These orthologs present divergent architectures and regulatory features governing PAM recognition, gRNA binding, dimerization, and DNA cleavage. Notably, Cas12f-MG119-28 achieves efficient R-loop formation via a stable dimer interface and a naturally optimized guide RNA. These discoveries elucidate key mechanistic determinants of Cas12f activity and may offer a framework for engineering compact genome editors with therapeutic potential.

Published in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (predicted rank #10) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.