Back

Editing of ADA2 Point Mutation in Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Kopcil, P.; Ervik, C. W.; Reint, G.; Mamia, K.; Szymanska, M.; Dahal-Koirala, S.; Conradi, J.; Skjelbostad, S. F.; Donasen, O. A.; Jiang, X.; Fahlquist-Hagert, C.; Kristiansen, O.; Michelsen, T. M.; Melum, E.; Bak, R. O.; Komisarczuk, A. Z.; Haapaniemi, E. M.

2025-08-14 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.08.14.670303 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe homozygous ADA2: c.506G>A (p.Arg169Gln; p.R169Q) variant accounts for majority of Deficiency in Adenosine Deaminase 2 (DADA2). This monogenic disorder may be amenable to ex vivo gene therapy by correcting the pathogenic mutation in CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). ObjectiveTo apply CRISPR-Cas9 and homology-directed repair (HDR) as a surrogate strategy to model correction of the pathogenic ADA2 c.506G>A variant in healthy cord blood HSPCs. MethodsHSPCs were electroporated with optimised CRISPR-Cas9 editing reagents, and editing outcomes, including HDR and on-target deletions, were quantified by ddPCR. Cell functionality was assessed through colony-forming unit (CFU) assays and by xenotransplantation into NOD SCID Gamma (NSG) mice. Two HDR enhancement strategies were tested: (1) genetic inhibitors of p53 and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathways, and (2) pharmacological NHEJ inhibition. ResultsSmall-molecule NHEJ inhibitors increased HDR efficiency approximately two-fold (from [~]40 % to [~]80 %). Edited HSPCs retained normal CFU capacity and successfully engrafted in NSG mice. However, up to 8 % of edited cells exhibited on-target chromosome loss, though this declined over time. Up to 40 % of T cells and fibroblasts demonstrated similar losses under NHEJ inhibitors treatment. In contrast, genetically encoded inhibitors did not improve HDR. ConclusionThe ADA2 p. c.506G>A variant can be effectively edited employing surrogate strategy in HSPCs without impairing functionality. Although pharmacological inhibition of NHEJ enhances HDR efficiency, it also increases the risk of on-target chromosome aberrations, highlighting the need for careful consideration of the associated risks and benefits in therapeutic gene editing. Key messages1) The ADA2 p.R169Q variant can be efficiently corrected via HDR, and the edited CD34+ HSPCs retain their engraftment capability in NSG mice. 2) Pharmacological inhibition of NHEJ using small-molecule inhibitors increases HDR efficiency but is associated with significant on-target deletions and chromosomal arm loss, particularly in differentiated cell types, and in a donor-dependent manner. Capsule summaryThe ADA2 p.R169Q variant is a viable target for precision gene editing in hematopoietic stem cells. Although inhibition of NHEJ improves HDR efficiency, it concomitantly increases the risk of large on-target deletions, particularly in differentiated cells.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
4
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
7
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
8
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
9
British Journal of Haematology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
10
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
11
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
12
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
13
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
15
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
20
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
23
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%