Back

Specificity and exon target space of splicing modifying compounds

Lenkeit, F.; Knehr, J.; Altorfer, M.; Byrnes, A.; Li, W.; Hsiao, J.; Kolter, C.; Skaanderup, P. R.; Mullin, S.; Solovyeva, E.; Krueger, A. T.; Ottl, J.; Gubser Keller, C.; Naumann, U.; Ottis, P.; Reyes, A.

2025-08-17 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.08.14.670273 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Modulation of splicing has become an established therapeutic strategy, with proven clinical applications and continued potential to target specific exons to influence gene expression. Recent advancements led to the identification of small molecule splicing modifiers such as Risdiplam and Branaplam. These compounds induce the inclusion of exons that are typically skipped due to their weak 5' splice site. While Risdiplam has a preference to induce exons with a N-3G-2A-1 sequence at the 3' exon end, Branaplam has a proclivity towards introducing A-3G-2A-1 -ending exons. However, the variables that determine the selectivity and specificity of splicing modulators are still not completely understood, as evidenced by the hundreds of unaffected N-3G-2A-1 -ending exons present in the human genome. In this study, we delve into the molecular mechanisms governing the specificity of splicing-modifying compounds, focusing on their interactions with RNA structures at splice sites. Using biochemical assays, whole transcriptome analyses, and genetic perturbation approaches, our findings reveal contributions of primary sequence codependencies that help determine the required secondary structural conformation, thus governing responsiveness to splicing modulator induction. Based on these learnings, we were able to reprogram the specificity of splicing modulators by genetic manipulation of the U1 snRNA component of the spliceosome. Our findings further the understanding of splicing modulators and might help to identify new targets and compounds.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.