Back

Mapping social relevance in affective scenes: A large-scale multidimensional rating study

Mitschke, V.; Grassi, F.; Doganer, A.; Schacht, A.

2025-08-16 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.14.670229 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how individuals evaluate social content in affective scenes is crucial for research in emotion, social cognition, and decision-making. However, standardized image databases often lack fine-grained ratings of social dimensions beyond basic emotional content. We present a normative dataset of 296 affective scenes rated by 424 adult participants across six social-affective dimensions: social relevance, emotion sharing, action sharing, interpersonal equality, scene pleasantness, and participatory arousal. Each image was independently coded for objective features such as number of people, face visibility, and gaze direction. All rating dimensions showed excellent interrater reliability. Pleasantness ratings demonstrated strong convergent validity with established valence norms from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), while arousal ratings differentiated between experienced and participatory arousal, suggesting that the latter captures a distinct affective component. Correlation analyses revealed that social relevance was strongly predicted by scene pleasantness and a composite "engagement" factor combining emotion sharing, action sharing, and equality. Notably, the association between pleasantness and social relevance was especially pronounced in scenes depicting single individuals. Linear mixed models further indicated that extraversion modestly amplified the relationship between engagement and social relevance, while other personality traits and empathy did not significantly affect ratings. This open-access dataset provides a reliable, multidimensional tool for selecting affective scenes based on both emotional and social-interpersonal features. It supports improved stimulus control and design in a wide range of behavioral and neurocognitive research. By systematically mapping social meaning in static affective scenes, our study advances existing methodological resources and offers empirical insight into the structure of social-affective appraisals. All image codes, mean ratings, and analysis scripts are publicly available via the Open Science Framework.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.9%
3
Psychological Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
5
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.2%
7
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
9
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
15
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
16
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Communications Psychology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
20
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.6%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.6%