Multiplexed Perturbation Enables Scalable Pooled Screens
Oberlin, S.; Tay, N. Q.; Xue, A.; Pimentel, H.; McManus, M.
Show abstract
CRISPR-based genetic perturbation screens have revolutionized the ability to link genes to cellular phenotypes with unprecedented precision and scale. However, conventional pooled CRISPR screens require large cell numbers to achieve adequate sgRNA representation, posing technical and financial challenges. Here, we investigate the impact of co-delivery of multiple guide RNAs via high multiplicity of infection (MOI) in pooled CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) screens as a strategy to enhance screening efficiency while reducing cell numbers. We systematically evaluate screen performance across varying MOIs, assessing the effects of multiplexing on knockdown efficiency, sgRNA representation, and potential interference of multiple sgRNA phenotypes. Our data demonstrate that sgRNA multiplexing (MOI 2.5-10) can maintain screen performance while enabling significant reductions in cell number requirements. We further apply these optimized conditions to conduct a genome-wide CRISPR screen for regulators of the intracellular adhesion molecule ICAM-1, successfully identifying novel candidates using as few as half a million cells. This study provides a framework for adopting multiplexed sgRNA strategies to streamline CRISPR screening applications in resource-limited settings.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling asymmetric count ratios in CRISPR screens to decrease experiment size and improve phenotype detection 96%
- Partial gene suppression improves identification of cancer vulnerabilities when CRISPR-Cas9 knockout is pan-lethal 95%
- Conditional resampling improves calibration and sensitivity in single cell CRISPR screen analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.