Postpartum and Youth Depression in the Context of Vitamin D Supplementation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Nano, J. P.; Catterall, W.; Khaleghzadegan, S.; Castelblanco, C. A.; Blunt, H. B.; Yen, R. W.
Show abstract
BackgroundWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of vitamin D supplementation on depression among adolescents and young adults compared with placebo and baseline. MethodsWe searched databases and reference lists from inception to May 2024 for English-language studies, including cohort studies, case studies, and randomized clinical trials. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated the standardized mean difference (SMD) in depression scores (primary outcome) and anxiety scores (secondary outcome). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I{superscript 2} statistic. ResultsFifteen studies (2010-2024) from 7,638 citations met inclusion criteria. The mean sample size was 5,271 (range: 38-74,840). Meta-analysis of nine studies showed that vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced depression scores versus placebo (SMD: -0.43; 95%CI: -0.75 to -0.12; p=0.007; I{superscript 2}=78%). Of six studies not included in the meta-analysis, five reported significant associations between supplementation and lower depression. Subgroup effects were observed for postpartum women (SMD: -0.55; 95%CI: -1.04 to -0.06; p<0.05; I{superscript 2}=83%) and young adults (SMD: -1.38; 95%CI: -1.65 to -1.10; p<0.001; I{superscript 2}=76%). Meta-analysis of four studies found no significant association with anxiety (SMD: -0.31; 95%CI: -0.75 to 0.12; p=0.16; I{superscript 2}=77%). LimitationsVariability in study sample sizes may affect interpretation and generalizability. ConclusionsVitamin D supplementation was associated with lower depression scores, with effects varying by subgroup.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased neurotoxicity due to activated immune-inflammatory and nitro-oxidative stress pathways in patients with suicide attempts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 94%
- The association of personality traits with childhood obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Exploring the Efficacy and Potential of Large Language Models for Depression: A Systematic Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mechanisms linking physical activity with psychiatric symptoms: a protocol for a systematic review 95%
- Global prevalence of antidepressant utilization in the community: A protocol for a systematic review 94%
- Side effect profile and comparative tolerability of newer generation antidepressants in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Effectiveness of aerobic physical exercise on depression symptoms in adults: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials 94%
- On the treatment effect heterogeneity of antidepressants in major depression. A Bayesian meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations of cannabis use, tobacco use and incident anxiety, mood, and psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
- Social relationships and depression during the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal analysis of the COVID-19 social study 91%
- Pro-cognitive effects of 5-HT4 receptor agonism in individuals with remitted depression 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The intergenerational effects of parental physical activity on offspring brain and neurocognition in humans: a scoping review 91%
- Increased atherogenicity in mood disorders: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression 91%
- Problematic usage of the internet and eating disorders: a multifaceted, systematic review and meta-analysis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.