Back

Genome-wide analysis of 439 mass spectrometry-based proteomic profiles in a population of 15,035 Scottish individuals

Richmond, A.; Robertson, J. A.; Smith, H. M.; Hillary, R. F.; Zelezniak, A.; Vernardis, S.; Chybowska, A. D.; Grauslys, A.; Mur, J.; Campbell, A.; Drake, C.; Grant, H.; Adkin, P.; White, M.; Brigden, C.; Messner, C. B.; Porteous, D. J.; Hayward, C.; McIntosh, A. M.; McCartney, D. L.; Raiser, M.; Marioni, R. E.

2025-08-15 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.08.14.25333677 medRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the genetic architecture of the circulating proteome can help determine if a protein is causally linked to disease. Previous large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of proteins have mostly been conducted to pre-defined, targeted subsets of the proteome, and have often concentrated on low abundance proteins, many of which dont exert their main function in serum. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics facilitates the study of high-abundance proteins and their isoforms, focussing on proteins active in blood. In 15,035 individuals from Generation Scotland, we performed GWAS of 439 highly abundant serum protein groups as identified and quantified by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. We identified 1,553 independent SNP signals for 398 proteins (PBonferroni < 1.2x10-10). Two-sample Mendelian Randomisation (MR) analyses were applied to test if the 398 proteins with significant SNP signals were causally associated with 79 common causes of morbidity and mortality. We report putative causal associations between 13 proteins and 17 outcomes including neuropsychiatric and cardiovascular conditions. Large scale genome-wide analyses of the high abundance proteome complement targeted approaches for the discovery of causal pathways of disease.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.