Back

Machine learning approach to dissect the clinical heterogeneity of IBD-associated fatigue

Chuah, C. S.; Hall, R.; Whelan, R.; Cartlidge, P.; Gros, B.; Iglesias-Flores, E.; Parkash, N.; Boyapati, R. K.; Ramos-Belinchon, C.; Ong, S.; Brownson, E.; Campbell, I.; Mowat, C.; Seenan, J. P.; MacDonald, J.; Ho, G.-T.

2025-08-15 gastroenterology
10.1101/2025.08.14.25333676 medRxiv
Show abstract

Extreme fatigue is a clinical symptom that affects >50% of individuals with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), with a similar prevalence across many common immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). Despite its ubiquity, human scientific studies have yet to explain the mechanistic basis of this pervasive and complex symptom. One fundamental reason for this, is our inability to account for the clinical heterogeneity of fatigue with its multifactorial nature. We present the conceptual machine learning (ML) framework to dissect the complex nature of fatigue using one of the largest prospectively captured, real-world patient-reported outcome (PROs) on wellbeing from three contemporaneous cohorts (2020-present), totalling 2,970 responses from 2,290 participants across the UK and internationally, including non-IBD controls with 100 lines of clinical metadata. We systematically defined the (1) threshold of fatigue as our primary outcome ([≥]10/14 fatigue days) to build our ML approach, (2) utilised routinely available clinical data that can be used at a population-level analysis, (3) employed seven different ML methods with external validation in 3 different cohorts in UK, Spain and Australia (n=252), (4) employed Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis to break down the clinical heterogeneity to allow the examination of clinical predictive factors at an individual level; and finally (5), investigate whether there are distinct clusters of fatigue patients. We found that ML models performed comparably (AUC/C-index [~]0.7) on external validation with SHAP analysis showing interpretable, individualised fatigue drivers and five distinct fatigue phenotypes, including a subgroup of young males with significantly lower fatigue burden. Our data therefore provides the ML roadmap to predict and deconstruct fatigue in IBD and potentially also more widely in IMIDs, enabling patient-level dissection beyond symptom-based classification with the ability to integrate deep molecular data. This is a step towards future clinical-scientific AI models with the immediate clinical application to stratify patients to human experimental studies to better understand the dominant mechanisms that drive fatigue at an individual level.

Published in BMJ Digital Health & AI · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
2
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
3
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
6.8%
5
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Gut
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.6%
9
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
10
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.7%
11
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
15
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Gastroenterology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
18
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.1%
21
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
American Journal of Gastroenterology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
Immunity
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Science Signaling
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%