Back

The role of physical activity programmes in mitigating obesity and type 2 diabetes in Singapore using simulation-based forecasts until 2050

Normatov, B.; Song, H.; Jin, S.; Zhang, X.; He, Y.; Lim, N. W.; Zheng, V.-F.; Bin Mohd Aziz, M. H.; Muller-Riemenschneider, F.; Lee, C. P. L.; Dickens, B. L.

2025-08-19 public and global health
10.1101/2025.08.14.25333249 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe National Steps Challenge (NSC) is a physical activity intervention that has enrolled over 2.1 million people in Singapore across 9 years. The impacts of this intervention on current and future obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) prevalence are currently unknown. Here, we estimate population-level impacts and explore future scenarios in how physical activity interventions could mitigate rising obesity and T2DM burdens. MethodsUsing a microsimulation model of 7.9 million Singapore residents and NSC participation data, we modelled the impacts of physical activity on BMI trajectories and T2DM prevalence across the Singaporean population from 1990 to 2050 by ethnicity, sex, age, and body-mass-index subgroups. We then simulated five programme scenarios, ranging from no NSC to full population-wide deployment, projecting estimated future impacts. FindingsWithout the NSC, total obesity prevalence was projected to rise from 13.6% (total n=261,675) in 1990 to 32.4% (total n=1,189,081) by 2050, and T2DM from 5.8% (total n=111,597) to 16.0% (total n=587,200). Based on current recruitment and programme retention rates, relative to the No NSC, total obesity and T2DM prevalence could decrease by 15.8% and 6.2%, respectively, by 2050. These reductions are estimated to vary substantially by ethnicity and sex, and programme scenario. InterpretationPhysical activity programmes such as the NSC can help mitigate rising obesity and T2DM prevalence when implemented at the population level, as seen in Singapore. However, their success depends on robust digital infrastructure and sustained incentivisation to enhance long-term impact.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.