Back

Spinal Motor Neuron Pools May be Partly Driven by Impulsive Common Inputs

Yanguas-Mayo, J.; Pascual-Valdunciel, A.; Baker, S. N.; Laguna, P.; Farina, D.; Ibanez, J.

2025-08-18 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.08.13.670065 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spinal motor neurons serve as the link between the nervous system and muscles. As the final common pathway of the neuromuscular system, they receive inputs from both higher-level controllers and afferent pathways. It is often assumed that spinal motor neurons are primarily driven by continuous common inputs (cCI) within different frequency bands. Within this framework, the motor neuron pool behaves as a linear amplifier of the cCI. However, this framework overlooks the possibility that motor neurons could also be driven by impulsive common inputs (iCI), which can induce synchronization among them and disrupt the linear transmission of other synaptic inputs at the pool level. To test this hypothesis, computational simulations and experimental data from human subjects were used to characterize different aspects related to motor neuron spiking synchronization at the pool level. Our findings suggest that, indeed, iCI can account for relevant features observed in experimental data such as the presence of synchronization events at the pool level. We also observed that such impulsive inputs can affect the linearity in the transmission of cCI by the motor neuron pool. This study represents pioneering indirect evidence of the existence of iCI as inputs to motor neurons. Significant StatementMotor unit pool behavior in terms of spiking synchronization and spectral content typically observed in experimental recordings cannot be reproduced in simulations that only use continuous common inputs (cCI) to motor neurons. This study shows, for the first time, evidence supporting that spinal motor neurons receive a portion of their synaptic input in the form of impulsive common inputs (iCI) that synchronize their activity. The study also shows how such iCI can affect the linear transmission of other cCI by the motor neuron pool.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.