Back

Interpretable Machine Learning on Soybean Multi Omics Data Reveals Drought-Driven Shifts of Plant-Microbe Interactions

Yoshioka, H.; Debeljak, P.; Prado, S.; Iwata, H.

2025-08-13 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.08.13.670005 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPlant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere are central to plant growth, nutrient acquisition, and stress resilience. Multi-omics approaches enable comprehensive profiling of different biological layers, yet integrating these data to understand the mechanisms underlying plant-microbe symbiosis, particularly under drought stress, remains a major challenge. ResultsWe integrated genomic, metabolomic, and microbiome data from 198 soybean accessions grown under both control and drought conditions to identify environment-specific predictive features of plant phenotypes. We compared best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP), genome-wide association study (GWAS), and a nonlinear machine learning model (Random Forest; RF) to evaluate their ability to detect informative features. RF models provided flexible variable selection and outperformed linear models in capturing nonlinear dependencies. Model interpretation using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) revealed that the isoflavone derivative daidzin and the drought-tolerant Candidatus Nitrosocosmicus are major contributors to phenotypic variation, specifically under drought stress. SHAP-based interaction networks revealed cross-omics links, such as connections between daidzin, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and Paenibacillus. ConclusionThe application of an interpretable machine learning approach to the plant phenotype prediction framework identifies multi-omics biomarkers and interactions, providing insights into plant adaptation to drought stress through environment-dependent rhizosphere networks and symbiotic associations.

Published in Environmental Microbiome (predicted rank #28) · training set

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.