Effects of ignoring anaerobic contributions when measuring change in the energy cost of walking in chronic stroke

ObjectiveTo determine whether the common practice of estimating energy cost of walking (CW) using only aerobic energy (oxygen consumption, O2) while excluding anaerobic energy (excess carbon dioxide production, CO2) introduces systematic and/or random error into the CW change estimates in individuals with chronic stroke. Design, setting, and participantsThe HIT-Stroke Trial randomized 55 individuals with walking limitations in chronic stroke to moderate or high intensity walking training. InterventionBoth groups performed walking exercise 3 times per week for 12 weeks. Main OutcomeTreadmill graded exercise testing with metabolic data collection was performed after 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of walking training. Mean CW changes (averaged across 4, 8 and 12 weeks) were estimated using only O2 (CWO2) versus using both O2 and CO2 (CWO2+CO2). CW changes were calculated during the final 3 minutes of each exercise test (i.e. peak-speed) and during equivalent speeds of the last 3 minutes of the shortest exercise test (i.e, matched-speed). Linear mixed-effects models and bootstrapping were used to compare CW change estimates and their standard errors (SE) between CWO2 and CWO2+CO2. ResultsAt peak-speed, CWO2 showed similar changes to CWO2+CO2 (difference: -0.04 J/kg/m, 95% CI: -0.09, 0.03), and had the same relative SE (coefficient of variation difference: 0.0% [-0.9, 0.7]). At matched-speeds, CWO2 underestimated improvements by 18.2% (0.08 J/kg/m, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.15) compared to CWO2+CO2, and had higher relative SE (+10.3% [5.7, 13.5]). ConclusionDisregarding anaerobic contributions (excess CO2) during CW calculation may result in underestimation of training-related improvement and reduce measurement precision when estimating CW changes at matched-speeds.